RE: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2630bis-05.txt and draft-ietf-smime-cmsalg-06.txt
"Jim Schaad" <jimsch@nwlink.com> Thu, 04 October 2001 09:20 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA03052 for <smime-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 05:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id f948qeK29163 for ietf-smime-bks; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 01:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from femail36.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail36.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.254.60.26]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f948qdD29155 for <ietf-smime@imc.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 01:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from revelation ([65.4.166.11]) by femail36.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20011004085234.FZOC2107.femail36.sdc1.sfba.home.com@revelation>; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 01:52:34 -0700
Reply-To: jimsch@exmsft.com
From: Jim Schaad <jimsch@nwlink.com>
To: "'Housley, Russ'" <rhousley@rsasecurity.com>
Cc: ietf-smime@imc.org
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2630bis-05.txt and draft-ietf-smime-cmsalg-06.txt
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 01:52:52 -0700
Message-ID: <004a01c14cb1$f426cb30$0c00a8c0@soaringhawk.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.2.20011003162916.02e31260@exna07.securitydynamics.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2526.0000
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The current version does not have the requested change by me to reference the IETF ASN.1 modules for items such as certificate. I thought that you had agreed to do this. Do I remember incorrectly or did you change your mind? Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org > [mailto:owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org] On Behalf Of Housley, Russ > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 1:35 PM > To: jis@mit.edu; mleech@nortelnetworks.com > Cc: scoya@ietf.org; ietf-smime@imc.org > Subject: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2630bis-05.txt and > draft-ietf-smime-cmsalg-06.txt > > > > Jeff & Marcus: > > The S/MIME WG is finished with rfc2630bis-05 and cmsalg-06. These > documents are ready for publication as standards-track RFCs > following IETF > Last Call and IESG approval. The rfc2630bis-05 document > obsoletes RFC 2630. > > Title : Cryptographic Message Syntax > Author(s) : R. Housley > Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2630bis-05.txt > Pages : 52 > Date : 01-Oct-01 > > Title : Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Algorithms > Author(s) : R. Housley > Filename : draft-ietf-smime-cmsalg-06.txt > Pages : 23 > Date : 01-Oct-01 > > Russ >
- draft-ietf-smime-rfc2630bis-05.txt and draft-ietf… Housley, Russ
- RE: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2630bis-05.txt and draft-… Jim Schaad