Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (4727)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 01 July 2016 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0575012D662 for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zeP6urq9kywL for <smime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D6FF12D660 for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8454300540 for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:19:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ayO1PVAHUwBe for <smime@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:19:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E60E300499; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:19:57 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160701080332.4516DB80CF3@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 10:19:57 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C926C9A-FB66-41F4-955C-687B606871B2@vigilsec.com>
References: <20160701080332.4516DB80CF3@rfc-editor.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/kHevHvMF9jsMPwMWMlKk4cTt3h8>
Cc: IETF SMIME <smime@ietf.org>, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, peter.dettman@bouncycastle.org
Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5084 (4727)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:20:07 -0000

This is a simple typo.  You can either accept it or hold for a future update.

Russ


On Jul 1, 2016, at 4:03 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5084,
> "Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5084&eid=4727
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Peter Dettman <peter.dettman@bouncycastle.org>
> 
> Section: 3.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   The AES-GCM authenticated encryption algorithm is described in [GCM].
>   A brief summary of the properties of AES-CCM is provided in Section
>   1.5.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   The AES-GCM authenticated encryption algorithm is described in [GCM].
>   A brief summary of the properties of AES-GCM is provided in Section
>   1.5.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Section 3.2 discusses AES-GCM, and links to Section 1.5 (titled "AES-GCM"), so the text "AES-CCM" in the second sentence should be "AES-GCM".
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5084 (draft-ietf-smime-cms-aes-ccm-and-gcm-03)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Using AES-CCM and AES-GCM Authenticated Encryption in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
> Publication Date    : November 2007
> Author(s)           : R. Housley
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>