RE: Comments draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt

Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org> Fri, 26 March 2004 05:42 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA17356 for <smime-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:42:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2Q5PhnY005428; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:25:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i2Q5Phbu005427; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:25:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from [63.202.92.152] (adsl-63-202-92-152.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.92.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2Q5PeDH005419; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:25:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@imc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: phoffman@mail.imc.org
Message-Id: <p06100401bc896edca718@[63.202.92.152]>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAARMPfbnbp50SwK3EZjypY2MKAAA AQAAAAR/p96J7N0E+uAoyEYCZkhAEAAAAA@brutesquadlabs.com>
References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAARMPfbnbp50SwK3EZjypY2MKAAA AQAAAAR/p96J7N0E+uAoyEYCZkhAEAAAAA@brutesquadlabs.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:25:46 -0800
To: Blake Ramsdell <blake@brutesquadlabs.com>, jimsch@exmsft.com
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Subject: RE: Comments draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt
Cc: 'Ietf-Smime' <ietf-smime@imc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

At 8:44 PM -0800 3/25/04, Blake Ramsdell wrote:
>  > 1.  I just realized there is no abstract for this document.  Is one
>>  required?
>
>Don't know -- someone comment.

Yes, an abstract is required. The wimpy way out is to move the first 
paragraph of the Intro into the Abstract.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium