[smime] [Errata Verified] RFC2631 (7761)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 16 January 2024 18:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF27C14F71B; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:37:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DdFedeGsuDve; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168A9C14F70F; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 07A4F1A49953; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:37:53 -0800 (PST)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, ekr@rtfm.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, smime@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240116183753.07A4F1A49953@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:37:53 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/smime/pHIUIa-d288kDOLqxnZ0VSe2YcM>
Subject: [smime] [Errata Verified] RFC2631 (7761)
X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: SMIME Working Group <smime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/smime/>
List-Post: <mailto:smime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime>, <mailto:smime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:37:57 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC2631, "Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7761 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Date Reported: 2024-01-12 Verified by: RFC Editor Section: 2.2.1.1 Original Text ------------- 6. If p > 2^(L-1) use a robust primality test to test whether p is prime. Else go to 18. Corrected Text -------------- 16. If p > 2^(L-1) use a robust primality test to test whether p is prime. Else go to 18. Notes ----- This should be numbered as step 16, not step 6. -------------------------------------- RFC2631 (draft-ietf-smime-x942-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Method Publication Date : June 1999 Author(s) : E. Rescorla Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF
- [smime] [Errata Verified] RFC2631 (7761) RFC Errata System