[Snac] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-snac-simple-09 (Ends 2026-05-15)

[Timothy Winters <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eric and David,

I'm working on the Shepard write-up; I've started reviewing the document
and I'm aiming to complete it by the end of this week.

~Tim

On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 12:03 PM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Just a ping to check the status 😉
>
> -éric
>
> *From: *Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 26 May 2026 at 00:47
> *To: *Darren Dukes <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <
> [e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <
> [e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[Snac] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-snac-simple-09 (Ends
> 2026-05-15)
>
> Dear SNAC WG,
>
> When can I expect that this draft will join my 'publication requested'
> queue ?
>
> I.e., WGLC is over since 15th of May (unsure whether there has been
> several reviews), need a shepherd write-up (hey Tim 😉 ), and then click on
> the "Request Publication" button by the chairs 😉
>
> Looking forward to pushing this I-D towards publication,
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
>
> *From: *Darren Dukes via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Saturday, 25 April 2026 at 14:21
> *To: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[Snac] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-snac-simple-09 (Ends
> 2026-05-15)
>
> And now the official last call from data tracker..
>
> This message starts a WG Last Call for:
> draft-ietf-snac-simple-09
>
> This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-05-15
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes a set of practices for connecting stub
>    networks to adjacent infrastructure networks.  This is applicable in
>    cases such as constrained (Internet of Things) networks where there
>    is a need to provide functional parity of service discovery and
>    reachability between devices on the stub network and devices on an
>    adjacent infrastructure link (for example, a home network).
>
> File can be retrieved from:
>
> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping
> [e-mail]
> in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are
> highly appreciated.
>
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1].
> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
> provisions
> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
> found at [3].
>
> Thank you.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-snac-simple/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-snac-simple-09.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-snac-simple-09
>
> --
> Snac mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>