IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Snac] Router using Ipv6 prefix length = 67

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 07 June 2023 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: snac@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: snac@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8977C151079 for <snac@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4zyU-XInzGgR for <snac@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B13C15106E for <snac@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6260b578097so61258416d6.3 for <snac@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1686171553; x=1688763553; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YRTMmXtz3ZrHJbsr8REsArvmLhud31HfgLmVmDTxh9M=; b=YHHePFQUogNgXcU2xr3gDkEGs9zMWC7A717z15c6Tt9Na14GOY7Iei1bRgy/O8Lptz sXpA3X2DF7PwMyPdsrsH0h0z0BftivMnYbRswZEdJLRRlhoI9So6onvFRWcGpoWW3NmI IiwuwoaFb/oTaUTWCaS1ueXxhKaMuULI4fQRyqymrpwgQl4Y0Rzmwm8Btc7OqiexzdL4 sSVjMPOdv+dbP2Rar9G+zTtGPOOQqPbJxanf3w57GU/wdWYE4Ds1t+357PO1lz+Wz8K+ qFxT+QwNYrOrPWHzcxatYOVioC/XvH9DSzLdDoHdsvQvk8KuET0vU0qVJNk2TxVas//4 irLA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686171553; x=1688763553; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YRTMmXtz3ZrHJbsr8REsArvmLhud31HfgLmVmDTxh9M=; b=gnR5o1S7qDHG1JrMUBZZlE9+mnjn0MzhdG/KtfbyT66WAY6Z70cz0tkBdRsyCptwJq fC8Wzs4EhFfokwgJzR3wI3XbK7TcAsRlmxTAtCeGya6a/J7/z0lpU8v7z5fuTuFJo9/f isJUjwDxgn1Nucnq/YBExZafUfmuIDtytlIAOlgYlV9gNaaYYYJtwFmnMod+KzgznPVg 0cnxJ0W/TJX6tvNufc1mMze24TjS6HPKf/f7Wj4YIP+OP6DguEe2MTDBr29OR3Tr2ya3 uYcWRFJNjJcDz4dPayzwMgLnhg6GrOzvn9r/ceyurCoSC7WG0Kyr0MRh3Fvro2C5IGQ+ bSfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzYZ+BPul7pBeENUBhKLdtedN+4D6imU3DRmGtcvK4/M4imbq0z sXbp/27gi4uTWcXOekScoM4mdze0ccAlbp2kJIlD8DykksY4wDUkJwc3/g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5UZ6zWEi510B4qFzDN1kW9S/zYX4QmezK1o5LeUBM5O+sieYPF1X3ORJ3G88CoSSPfeZEX2RJK5q5ocdahsJs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:caa:b0:61a:43f0:7308 with SMTP id s10-20020a0562140caa00b0061a43f07308mr4971198qvs.27.1686171553311; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <39BE8173-F4D2-4B8C-A136-A5A7F441B3BF@amazon.com> <10B44E76-01E1-4A09-881D-2228B4E07508@amazon.com> <CAGwZUDvWAnFJO4KJCyd0k_ydxzZaxEZ+D9-WXFCb_gfOHWOPwA@mail.gmail.com> <786.1686096218@localhost> <CAPt1N1mqY=Psp0NN2MRd-UA9rgECiN_y-+NVA_sq=AA6FFLzzw@mail.gmail.com> <SJ0PR03MB6469F578812A680E7F29B961F753A@SJ0PR03MB6469.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR03MB6469F578812A680E7F29B961F753A@SJ0PR03MB6469.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:58:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mT-ojvAMFe89J2sJ3Z4oywa56BXTK+v_0X31S++eaZCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kiran Makhijani <kiran.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "snac@ietf.org" <snac@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000077415a05fd906838"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/snac/RXgGPltsmugtWSDCBl5syh7ErYg>
Subject: Re: [Snac] Router using Ipv6 prefix length = 67
X-BeenThere: snac@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discussing problems relating to the automatic connection of stub networks to existing infrastructure networks. " <snac.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/snac>, <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/snac/>
List-Post: <mailto:snac@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/snac>, <mailto:snac-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 20:59:16 -0000

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:36 PM Kiran Makhijani <kiran.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>    1. besides defining the usable prefix with prefix-length 64 bits, does
>    it make sense to add reference to 7084 section 4.3 as suggested? (I think
>    I’d prefer that but then I had assumed prefix will always be /64).
>
>
Are you referring to L-2?


>
>    1.
>    2. Second question Alan asked was about BR’s (stub-router’s)
>    robustness. So, nothing else to be specified for that. Right?
>
>
I think that requiring a PIO to have a prefix length of 64 in order to
qualify as a usable prefix addresses the robustness question Alan brought
up.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email