Re: Bridge MIB
Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com> Thu, 22 October 1992 22:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10648; 22 Oct 92 18:06 EDT
Received: from NRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10644; 22 Oct 92 18:06 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18809; 22 Oct 92 18:07 EDT
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA10821; Thu, 22 Oct 92 15:06:57 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA29815; Thu, 22 Oct 92 14:47:50 -0700
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA29804; Thu, 22 Oct 92 14:47:28 -0700
Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA22562; Thu, 22 Oct 92 14:31:27 -0700
Received: by saffron.acc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)id AA03370; Thu, 22 Oct 92 14:30:39 PDT
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1992 14:30:39 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Message-Id: <9210222130.AA03370@saffron.acc.com>
To: dcabell@smtp.xtree.com
Subject: Re: Bridge MIB
Cc: bridge-mib@pa.dec.com, snmp@psi.com
>> Where can I obtain a copy of the IETF Bridge MIB? Well, you could look at RFC 1286, or you could look at draft-ietf-bridge-objects-00.txt, available wherever Internet Drafts are to be found. The latter is Anil Rijsinghani's update based on the meeting of the working group in July. Which brings me to another point; the draft has been posted for a week or two now, and no-one has posted any remarks that I've seen. If I don't see anything within the next week, I'll ship it off to the IESG with the words "Please Promote to Draft Standard". I'm SURE they don't have anything better to think about... Fred
- Re: Bridge MIB Fred Baker