Re: New versions of documents

Donna McMaster <mcmaster@synoptics.com> Wed, 09 December 1992 21:43 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18526; 9 Dec 92 16:43 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18522; 9 Dec 92 16:43 EST
Received: from SLEEPY.TIS.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17678; 9 Dec 92 16:44 EST
Received: by sleepy.TIS.COM id aa04289; 9 Dec 92 21:32 GMT
Received: from sleepy.tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id aa04208; 9 Dec 92 20:48 GMT
Received: from tis.com by sleepy.TIS.COM id aa04198; 9 Dec 92 15:44 EST
Received: from synoptics.com (mvis1.synoptics.com) by TIS.COM (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA21138; Wed, 9 Dec 92 15:44:17 EST
Received: from mvis2 ([134.177.100.92]) by synoptics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA01638; Wed, 9 Dec 92 12:42:30 PST
Received: by mvis2 (4.1/2.0N) id AA23504; Wed, 9 Dec 92 12:42:32 PST
Message-Id: <9212092042.AA23504@mvis2>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1992 12:42:32 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Donna McMaster <mcmaster@synoptics.com>
To: snmp-sec-dev@tis.com
Subject: Re: New versions of documents
Cc: mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us

Help!  I'm confused by the proliferation of snmpsec drafts in the 
internet-drafts directories.  Which one(s) are still valid targets
of discussion?

The drafts in the internet-drafts directory on ftp.nisc.sri.com as
of noon PST today:

gvaudre   103864 Dec  8 04:15 draft-ietf-snmpsec-adminv2-00.txt
gvaudre     2382 Dec  9 04:25 draft-ietf-snmpsec-mib-02.txt
gvaudre    91912 Dec  9 04:33 draft-ietf-snmpsec-model-00.txt
gvaudre    62056 Dec  9 04:17 draft-ietf-snmpsec-party-00.txt
gvaudre    80228 Dec  8 04:15 draft-ietf-snmpsec-partyv2-00.txt
gvaudre   109182 Dec  9 04:34 draft-ietf-snmpsec-proto-00.txt
gvaudre   376538 Dec  9 04:26 draft-ietf-snmpsec-protocols-02.ps
gvaudre     2400 Dec  9 04:26 draft-ietf-snmpsec-protocols-02.txt
gvaudre   125382 Dec  8 04:15 draft-ietf-snmpsec-protov2-00.txt


An attempt at sorting, these posted Dec 8.  The dates on the docs are 
Dec 6.  I think these are the ones that we are working from?

gvaudre   103864 Dec  8 04:15 draft-ietf-snmpsec-adminv2-00.txt
gvaudre    80228 Dec  8 04:15 draft-ietf-snmpsec-partyv2-00.txt
gvaudre   125382 Dec  8 04:15 draft-ietf-snmpsec-protov2-00.txt

These are the ones referenced in the I-D announcements that just
came out, and the posting date is newer, but the documents are dated
Nov 30 and Dec 1.  These are for reference only?

gvaudre    91912 Dec  9 04:33 draft-ietf-snmpsec-model-00.txt
gvaudre    62056 Dec  9 04:17 draft-ietf-snmpsec-party-00.txt
gvaudre   109182 Dec  9 04:34 draft-ietf-snmpsec-proto-00.txt

The first 2 of these are pointers to RFCs, and I assume the .ps file
is the postscript version of the RFC itself:

gvaudre     2382 Dec  9 04:25 draft-ietf-snmpsec-mib-02.txt
gvaudre     2400 Dec  9 04:26 draft-ietf-snmpsec-protocols-02.txt
gvaudre   376538 Dec  9 04:26 draft-ietf-snmpsec-protocols-02.ps
 
Marshall (or ???), can you please confirm or deny my conclusions?  

Thanks,
Donna

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Donna McMaster                                  Voice (408) 764-1206
mcmaster@synoptics.com                          Fax   (408) 764-1299