[12] Re: Towards Rough Concensus and Running Code

"Michael L. Kornegay" <mlk@bir.com> Thu, 17 August 1995 02:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26052; 16 Aug 95 22:50 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26048; 16 Aug 95 22:50 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08692; 16 Aug 95 22:50 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa19957; 16 Aug 95 22:18 EDT
Received: from relay.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa19941; 16 Aug 95 22:09 EDT
Received: from emory.mathcs.emory.edu(128.140.2.1) by relay.tis.com via smap (g3.0.1) id xma019055; Wed, 16 Aug 95 22:00:17 -0400
Received: from bir.UUCP by emory.mathcs.emory.edu (5.65/Emory_mathcs.4.0.15) via UUCP id AA04527 ; Wed, 16 Aug 95 22:09:36 -0400
Received: by bir.bir.com (uA-1.6v2); Wed, 16 Aug 95 21:58:19 EST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Michael L. Kornegay" <mlk@bir.com>
To: snmp2@tis.com
Subject: [12] Re: Towards Rough Concensus and Running Code
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 21:58:19 -0500
Reply-To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Message-Id: <0D15DDF1.5g6jr8@bir.bir.com>
X-Mailer: uAccess - Macintosh Release: 1.6v2

In Regards to your letter <6584.808580515@dbc.mtview.ca.us>:

> Proposal:	SNMPv2+USEC Remote Configuration MIB
> Authors:	McCloghrie, O'Keefe, Rose, Waters
> Drafts:		[12] draft-kzm-snmpv2-usec-conf-alt-00.txt

> this MIB module ready by August 25th.  However, we remind the working
> group that our position has been that the MIB, while important, was not
> urgent, and that it did not be completed in the same time-frame as the
> base USEC proposal.  We prefer that the working group spend its time

If [11] and [12] were considered together as a proposal to the WG, can
you briefly iterate such a proposal's advantages compared to SNMPv2AM?  

___________________
Michael L. Kornegay
Internet: mlk@bir.com   UUCP: bir!mlk