Re: Montreal Informal BOF on HTTP-based management.
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Mon, 17 June 1996 15:20 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18279; 17 Jun 96 11:20 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18275; 17 Jun 96 11:20 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09665; 17 Jun 96 11:20 EDT
Received: from neptune.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa08934; 17 Jun 96 10:43 EDT
Received: from relay.tis.com by neptune.TIS.COM id aa08918; 17 Jun 96 10:34 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id KAA07616; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 10:36:41 -0400
Received: from sol.tis.com(192.33.112.100) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma007609; Mon, 17 Jun 96 10:36:13 -0400
Received: from relay.tis.com by tis.com (4.1/SUN-5.64) id AA12537; Mon, 17 Jun 96 10:36:12 EDT
Received: by relay.tis.com; id KAA07606; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 10:36:11 -0400
Received: from tsunami.fv.com(204.250.90.8) by relay.tis.com via smap (V3.1.1) id xma007602; Mon, 17 Jun 96 10:35:57 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tsunami.dbc.mtview.ca.us (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA20785; Mon, 17 Jun 1996 07:38:32 -0700
To: Venkat Rangan <venkatr@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Montreal Informal BOF on HTTP-based management.
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Jun 1996 21:54:26 PDT." <c=US%a=_%p=msft%l=RED-31-MSG-960617045426Z-10212@tide21.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Id: <20783.835022311.1@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 07:38:31 -0700
Message-Id: <20784.835022311@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
X-Orig-Sender: snmpv2-approval@neptune.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
> I am gathering interest for an informal BOF during the upcoming Montreal,
> IETF meeting. We have developed an HTTP-based system and network
> management protocol and are curious to find out if there are others that
> have done similar work. If there is enough interest for standards track
> effort in this area, we can try and ask for an official BOF to be formed
> soon.
i am confused. the AD sent out a message last week
Message-Id: <31C05C1A.7068@qsun.att.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 14:21:14 -0400
From: Deirdre Kostick <kostick@qsun.ho.att.com>
Reply-To: kostick@qsun.ho.att.com
To: snmpv2@tis.com, snmp@psi.com
Cc: agenda@ietf.org
Subject: IETF NM Area Meeting Agenda - June '96
announcing that web-based management was a topic being discussed at the
NM's open area meeting:
> Tuesday, June 25 1530-1730
> Thursday, June 27 0900-1130
>
> Agenda Topics
> --------------
>
> o NM Area Highlights
>
> o New Working Group
> - DISTMAN
>
> o Application Management
>
> o "Web-based" Management
>
> o SNMP Security/Admin Framework
>
> o General SNMP Issues
it would seem that your topic is already being discussed in that venue.
/mtr
ps: the terms "informal BOF" and "official BOF" seem to be co-equally
oxymoronic.
- Montreal Informal BOF on HTTP-based management. Venkat Rangan
- Re: Montreal Informal BOF on HTTP-based managemen… Marshall Rose