[Softwires] [Errata Rejected] RFC5549 (6786)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 02 August 2023 14:08 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB68C15256B; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 07:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.864
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.864 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B8i1Xlb3G4Tt; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB9A9C152565; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 8CD653E8CB; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: mdubrovs@cisco.com, flefauch@cisco.com, erosen@cisco.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: evyncke@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, softwires@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230802140839.8CD653E8CB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 07:08:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/1wrckKfbjWU7Te2Jc_MEYJjkza4>
Subject: [Softwires] [Errata Rejected] RFC5549 (6786)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 14:08:43 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5549, "Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6786 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Mike Dubrovsky <mdubrovs@cisco.com> Date Reported: 2021-12-17 Rejected by: Éric Vyncke (IESG) Section: 4 Original Text ------------- A BGP speaker MUST only advertise to a BGP peer the IPv4 or VPN-IPv4 NLRI with an IPv6 Next Hop if the BGP speaker has first ascertained via BGP Capability Advertisement that the BGP peer supports the Extended Next Hop Encoding capability for the relevant AFI/SAFI pair. Corrected Text -------------- A BGP speaker MUST only advertise to a BGP peer the IPv4 or VPN-IPv4 NLRI with an IPv6 Next Hop if the BGP speaker has first ascertained via BGP Capability Advertisement that the BGP peer supports the Extended Next Hop Encoding capability for the relevant AFI/SAFI pair. IPv4 or VPN-IPv4 NLRI with an IPv6 Next Hop SHOULD be treated as malformed if it received from a BGP speaker that has not sent BGP Capability Advertisement for the relevant AFI/SAFI pair. Notes ----- The behavior was not explicitly mentioned. --VERIFIER NOTES-- The RFC 5549 has been obsoleted by RFC 8950. Per point 7 of https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-errata-ietf-stream/, this errata is rejected. It appears to me that RFC 8950 may have the same error and may also require a similar errata. Thanks for the report. -------------------------------------- RFC5549 (draft-ietf-softwire-v4nlri-v6nh-02) -------------------------------------- Title : Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop Publication Date : May 2009 Author(s) : F. Le Faucheur, E. Rosen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Softwires Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Softwires] [Errata Rejected] RFC5549 (6786) RFC Errata System