Re: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG

Hi David, Alain and the authors:

I have read the draft a few times, and I am still trying to understand the
applicability of this draft from implementation point of view.

In introduction, it refers to BGP-based auto-discovery for L1VPN as one
possible case. 
But, it'll be very helpful to the implementors community if this draft has a
section on applicability and a few sentences on possible deployment
scenarios where this TE extension is useful.

Best regards,
-Samita

>-----Original Message-----
>From: softwires-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On
>Behalf Of David Ward
>Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:43 PM
>To: idr; l1vpn@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org; isis mailing list;
>l3vpn@ietf.org; OSPF List; softwires@ietf.org; Yakov Rekhter; Don Fedyk;
>Hamid Ould-Brahim
>Cc: Alain Durand
>Subject: [Softwires] BGP TE attr last call by softwires WG
>
>The softwire WG has LC'ed
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-softwire-bgp-te-
>attribute-01.txt
>
>We will keep open an additional two-week period for wider review
>before moving forward in the publication process. Please have any
>comments to the authors and softwires WG by Aug 26, 2008.
>
>-DWard, Alain Durand
>_______________________________________________
>Softwires mailing list
>Softwires@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires