[Softwires] draft-matsuhira-sa46t-mcast-00
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 08:34 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9733D21F8B0B for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:34:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kp1kmBMQUqTb for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C8821F8DC3 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywt34 with SMTP id 34so5947866ywt.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:34:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iVq3k3YybwOD/5zQScaBrfQJlrU+8gkBP8DHW2kG590=; b=T2SLyEvejr8cy/l/LuioPldPvrmw+HXSdSfeeknFTowt3eOLurenDxCzzbG5W50Y4f 4Ob3O+1KX0Ys92ZxyLpkSmSYRE0o2xHZfNYg3100yVW+aoPpqGE/wH+IakJgFzZL5hU4 p7yydmUMRfL248bIlEVy4RCBTf0Y3TP2fBCzY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.235.40 with SMTP id i40mr7564479anh.39.1321346053312; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.191.228 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:34:13 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAccdwqU1PCiF6DY3e15oCNQWpqEajY96+i+e=V0S+q=eZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636b2b64022124804b1c1daaa"
Subject: [Softwires] draft-matsuhira-sa46t-mcast-00
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:34:17 -0000
Hi, I attended the presentation on this draft: draft-matsuhira-sa46t-mcast-00 It seems like the author has only addressed multicast address issue. The solution seems to have ignored what has been done on this issue so far, i.e. state-of-the-art. I suggest taking a look at Med's draft: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-boucadair-behave-64-multicast-address-format-03.txt Also you said: IPv4 multicast is supported by SA46T with same manner with IPv4 unicast. The above sentence is not correct. I suggest looking at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-softwire-4rdmulticast-00 Regards, Behcet
- [Softwires] draft-matsuhira-sa46t-mcast-00 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Softwires] draft-matsuhira-sa46t-mcast-00 Naoki Matsuhira