[Softwires] Updates to lw4o6 Draft (draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6)
<ian.farrer@telekom.de> Thu, 11 July 2013 06:47 UTC
Return-Path: <ian.farrer@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC8121F9CCA for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bVuG4e+460OX for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail43.telekom.de (tcmail43.telekom.de [80.149.113.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4B421F9BB2 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he113445.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.105]) by tcmail41.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 11 Jul 2013 08:46:37 +0200
Received: from HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM ([10.134.93.12]) by HE113445.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:46:37 +0200
From: ian.farrer@telekom.de
To: softwires@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:46:34 +0200
Thread-Topic: Updates to lw4o6 Draft (draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6)
Thread-Index: Ac5+AmOSVJTCMOrERKG4D5Eo/5CvUw==
Message-ID: <CE04216A.7DF5A%ian.farrer@telekom.de>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE04216A7DF5Aianfarrertelekomde_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Softwires] Updates to lw4o6 Draft (draft-ietf-softwire-lw4over6)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:47:19 -0000
Hi, I'm currently updating the lw4o6 draft in advance of IETF87. I plan to include the following changes: - I-D.bfmk-softwire-unified-cpe needs to be changed to I-D.ietf-softwire-unified-cpe throughout - Section 7 – the reference from I-D.ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-ipv6 should be changed to draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6 in line with the DHC recommendations - Section 5.2 does not consider what happens if a packet is received by the lwB4 that isn't addressed to the correct destination v4 address with a valid l4 port (there's a small discussion about this for MAP-E on the list at the moment). Propose that the lw4o6 draft is updated in line with the outcome of this discussions so that MAP-E & lw4o6 CPE behaviour stays aligned. - I-D.bfmk-softwire-unified-cpe is currently included as a normative reference, this will be moved to informative. - Add text to section 5.2 saying that any IPv4 fragments received by the lwB4 (CPE) after decapsulation are re-assembled before NAT, so that the whole packet can be translated. This is based on some problems encountered during interop testing. If you have any comments or objections to the above, please let me know. Cheers, Ian