IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Softwire Interim Meeting in Beijing

Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn> Fri, 19 August 2011 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D980E21F8AFD; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HAS_XAIMC=2.696, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUrjvCqhqv8k; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cernet.edu.cn (sea.net.edu.cn [202.112.39.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 875E421F8AD9; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 06:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1]([125.34.46.114]) by cernet.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm344e4ea1a8; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:24:14 +0800
Message-ID: <4E4E63FC.5000103@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:24:12 +0800
From: Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
References: <CA745379.C88C%cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn> <00D528DC-C6EB-4309-A30D-B2651AA9A156@cisco.com> <0F532823-5FA7-42C6-A610-5087D8F3E4D2@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <0F532823-5FA7-42C6-A610-5087D8F3E4D2@laposte.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AIMC-AUTH: xing
X-AIMC-MAILFROM: xing@cernet.edu.cn
X-AIMC-Msg-ID: ce6DZu0B
Cc: liziye <liziye@csnet1.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn>, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, iesg-secretary@ietf.org, Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Softwire Interim Meeting in Beijing
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:23:53 -0000

于 2011/8/19 21:03, Rémi Després 写道:
> Yong, Rajiv,
>
> Le 19 août 2011 à 14:16, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) a écrit :
>
>> Yong,
>>
>> Why is dIVI not included In the discussion ?
> In my understanding, differences between dIVI and the proposal of draft-murakami-softwire-4v6-translation-00 are minimal.
> They both use a double-translation tunneling method, with a stateless address mapping between A+P and IPv6.
>
> It seems therefore that either double-translation tunneling is out of scope, or dIVI is also in scope.

The dIVI is in scope and we would like to present two drafts

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xli-behave-divi/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xli-behave-divi-pd/

Regards,

xing

> Did I miss something?
>
> Regards,
> RD
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email