[Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-yang-14: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 07 January 2019 17:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietf.org
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C30130DEA; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 09:06:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-softwire-yang@ietf.org, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, softwire-chairs@ietf.org, jiangsheng@huawei.com, softwires@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154688080834.23339.13017406674509798540.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 09:06:48 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/B00RqL5kjDZndvfGZ5c8xQ78vyg>
Subject: [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-yang-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:06:48 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-softwire-yang-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Some minor comments: 1) Sec 4.2: "softwire-path-mru: optionally used to set the maximum IPv6 softwire packet size that can be received, including the encapsulation/translation overhead. Needed if the softwire implementation is unable to correctly calculate the correct IPv4 Maximum Receive Unit (MRU) size automatically [RFC4213]." I guess this should both be IPv6...? 2) Why does the description of "rcvd-ipv4-bytes" say "IPv4 traffic received for processing, in bytes"..? Does the "for processing" have any special meaning or why is it only phrased like this for that one entry? 3) Also the description for "sent-ipv4-bytes" and "sent-ipv4-packets" could be unified.
- [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dra… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Softwires] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on… ianfarrer