Re: [Softwires] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00.txt]

WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com> Tue, 08 June 2010 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD5728C0FF for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ghwUBcX-5frT for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta1.huaweisymantec.com (mta1.huaweisymantec.com [218.17.155.14]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E439C28C0ED for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com ([172.26.3.41]) by hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L3O00H7ESZCZX50@hstga01-in.huaweisymantec.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:30:48 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huaweisymantec.com ([127.0.0.1]) by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0L3O001GPSZ8L920@hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for softwires@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:30:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.27.154.72] by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (mshttpd); Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:30:44 +0800
From: WashamFan <Washam.Fan@huaweisymantec.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-id: <fc85c2f12275.4c0e7034@huaweisymantec.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:30:44 +0800
X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)
Content-language: en
X-Accept-Language: en
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <4C0CA2C5.20205@gmail.com>
References: <4C0CA2C5.20205@gmail.com>
Cc: softwires@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:30:47 -0000

Hi,

There are some concerns after I skimmed over the draft.
How many SIMPLE servers should be deployed in a metro
network? If SIMPLE servers are stateless, would anycast
address be used for avalability and load-balancing?
How does the ISP provision the IP address and port of
SIMPLE servers to the hosts behind the IPv4-only CPEs?
If SIMPLE servers are stateless, I assume the multicast
capability would be absent, right?

Thanks,
washam
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2010 0:26 am
Subject: [Softwires] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00.txt]
To: softwires@ietf.org


> Hi,
>  
>  This is another approach to stateless tunnels across subscriber NATs.
>  We've posted it in a preliminary form so that people can compare it with
>  the SAM-based proposal presented in Anaheim and with draft-lee-softwire-6rd-udp.
>  
>      Brian + Sheng
>  
>  -------- Original Message --------
>  Subject: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00.txt
>  Date: Mon,  7 Jun 2010 00:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
>  From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
>  Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
>  To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
>  
>  A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  
>  	Title           : Legacy NAT Traversal for IPv6: Simple Address 
> Mapping for Premises Legacy Equipment (SAMPLE)
>  	Author(s)       : B. Carpenter, S. Jiang
>  	Filename        : draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00.txt
>  	Pages           : 9
>  	Date            : 2010-06-07
>  
>  IPv6 deployment is delayed by the existence of millions of subscriber
>  network address translators (NATs) that cannot be upgraded to support
>  IPv6.  This document specifies a mechanism for traversal of such
>  NATs.  It is based on an address mapping and on a mechanism whereby
>  suitably upgraded hosts behind a NAT may obtain IPv6 connectivity via
>  a stateless server, known as a SAMPLE server, operated by their
>  Internet Service Provider.  SAMPLE is an alternative to the Teredo
>  protocol.
>  
>  A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00.txt
>  
>  
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Softwires mailing list
>  Softwires@ietf.org
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>