Re: [Softwires] draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite and MAP

Yuchi Chen <chenycmx@gmail.com> Tue, 29 January 2013 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <chenycmx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6E721F85AB for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:07:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jsyNdd4zMPus for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f174.google.com (mail-ve0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E292621F85A4 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:07:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c13so295240vea.33 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:07:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zst79jW5/WZIBXMB0rSVZ4ndFbKGdOEfDBf4mH9ATgs=; b=fK+PZnanCL8bX4Sa33woTIvl0TRfOlZnS1vC301YmpYMY1g/jmjZcn0PyPqgQWn9mM ymU8WCy8zQ5nOpXFxTeKogm5QD7YNO5JjV71BbL1Z4BQgrVsGLN9sGqp5fIqxj8kweJ+ kxCrZQpBoRNBOb3Dfzr4Yc00Nv33ILiJAbxcLpUFFOXEHyVNiUKoGHCrEGAo0ESV2qSN lyczCVjcj6tvHeKFY9xFKhnea8i1yHmpgtbIaIdQfLaN/+3bFACZA1P0SDfa9QVWWozj bXfORjOiWppmXRPD5oV+Dhgl7T56WYfx23+9/9fe3++jS93etzz8Rjhi5wdrpMYtq6CO C10Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.69.74 with SMTP id c10mr983235vdu.3.1359468440245; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:07:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.25.207 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:07:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A0626503-3B60-4C6F-901D-034AD74F19F7@gmail.com>
References: <510750C7.2010804@gmail.com> <A0626503-3B60-4C6F-901D-034AD74F19F7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:07:19 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGx7zWnF-b3B23=w3RZk6DurS1HZasvg5Ph+mNVF5gvmNxpWAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yuchi Chen <chenycmx@gmail.com>
To: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec501606576d75704d46de90a"
Cc: Softwires <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite and MAP
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:07:21 -0000

Dear Tom and Qi,

Thanks for your support for moving lw4o6 forward. Lw4o6 is simple and easy
to understand. The tests and trials that have been carried out show that
lw4o6 is easy to implement and deploy, and it can work well in the address
sharing scenario. As a participant of the lw4o6 demo in Atlanta, I was very
glad and considered it a great honor to show out all the great features of
lw4o6. IMHO, draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite is ready to move
forward as well.

Best regards!
Yuchi Chen

2013/1/29 Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>

>
> Dear Tom & all,
>
> IMHO, in addition to Tom's points,
> draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite is easier for OAM because there is
> no port mapping algorithm. It does not require operators to plan IPv6 and
> IPv4 address pool together, which is convenient for operators whose IPv4
> address pools are scattered, or IPv4/IPv6 address resources are managed by
> different servers.
>
> Also, I think draft-cui-* is ready to move forward.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Qi Sun
>
>
> On 2013-1-29, at 下午12:32, Tom Taylor wrote:
>
> > I figured it was time to pick on someone else, so I reviewed
> draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite. I found it really easy to
> understand, and all I found to change was a couple of typos.
> >
> > Of course, one reason lw4o6 easier to read than MAP is because it does
> not describe a port mapping algorithm. The other reason is because the MAP
> document has to describe the EA bits and their use. But that's a
> fundamental difference between the two approaches, and I can't see much
> chance to simplify MAP. The only possibility is to change the provisioning
> approach to provision the Rule IPv6 prefix, the complete shared IPv4
> address, and the PSID explicitly, then describe how to construct the MAP
> endpoint IPv6 address.
> >
> > Getting back to draft-cui-softwire-b4-translated-ds-lite, I'd say it's
> ready to be adopted.
> >
> > Tom Taylor
> > _______________________________________________
> > Softwires mailing list
> > Softwires@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>