IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] WGLC on draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-14

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Tue, 10 April 2018 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCEF1271DF for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 01:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CXjS3C3vGH32 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 01:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D67012D94A for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 01:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12669; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1523347988; x=1524557588; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=8UvpYO49e+pTgf+l+LozV3TicfFIC/BXXrRCfhjRzs4=; b=k11sNvw9GMcNqCi83xGTkEaDPJSTnmhBY8ch1oGg7s4DnkKWVBD3LBb6 49H5/ABgVeCVFt++XEA9pO+uP91wKwc7T/hZMndYBffyxCZV1dTViKU+V k/4LzQnZeMzHlu4Gi1gSG3SkM+xk3zGC4OI4mrsb0P1ox65ygOLmu49Lc I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DgAACYccxa/4wNJK1bGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNAXRhbyiDYIgBjQ6BdIEPjXmEZIF6CxgBCoQVSwIagighNBgBAgEBAQEBAQJsHAELhSIBAQEBAwEBIUsFAQUQAgEIEQQBASgDAgICJQsUCQgCBA4FG4QOZA+mRoIchFeDboIaBYdrgVQ/gQsBIoJigxEBAYICglowgiQChTOLHoZ4CAKLA4MwgTKDW4c2j2QCERMBgSQBHDiBUnAVOioBghiLEIU+b48ZAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.48,431,1517875200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="96104892"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2018 08:13:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3A8D7KA017495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:13:07 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 03:13:07 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com ([173.36.7.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 03:13:07 -0500
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: "xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn" <xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn>
CC: Softwires-wg list <softwires@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] WGLC on draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-14
Thread-Index: AQHT0HgMlrfisypilEiushSwt+VmzaP5ppO5
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:13:07 +0000
Message-ID: <DD7DA573-43AC-4B9C-95C3-B6AEEA70333F@cisco.com>
References: <7fd4d503.66.162ad39a3c2.Coremail.fuyu@cnnic.cn>, <2018041011001407397216@chinatelecom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2018041011001407397216@chinatelecom.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DD7DA57343AC4B9C95C3B6AEEA70333Fciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/F56f-VzVWLpx-hPeX7sXjN9JArE>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] WGLC on draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-14
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:13:17 -0000

Chongfeng,

Happy to hear wide IPv6 deployment in CT production network.

Could you please help us understand how is this draft related to the above ? Perhaps, moving from v4-only/dual-stack to IPv6-only (between CPE and BNG through ASBR) and deploying MAP function on CPE. Is that it ?  If yes, then MAP-T or E enabled on CPE by default going forward (recalling the trials)?


Cheers,
Rajiv Asati
Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Services


On Apr 10, 2018, at 5:00 AM, "xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn>" <xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn>> wrote:



hello, everyone,

As a co-author, I sincerely hope this work can go forward. Since we are in the stage of wide deployment of IPv6 in the product network, the solution defefined in this document can provide effective support of parameter configuration in multiple scenarios, such as broadband Internet access, multicast,etc.

BTW, thank you for your attention and support to this work.


Chongfeng



From: softwires-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yong Cui
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 9:44 PM
To: Softwires WG
Cc: softwire-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:softwire-chairs@ietf.org>; Yong Cui
Subject: [Softwires] WGLC on draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-14



Hi folks,



The authors of draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-14 believe this document is ready for advancement.

We would like to issue a working group last call starting from today to April 9th.



Please send your substantial comments to the list during the last call. You are also welcome to send your editorial comments directly to the authors.



Thanks for reviewing the draft.





Yong Cui and Ian Farrer





_______________________________________________

Softwires mailing list

Softwires@ietf.org<mailto:Softwires@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org<mailto:Softwires@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email