[Softwires] MAP-E interop/functionaly test by JANOG

Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 08:33 UTC

Return-Path: <shtsuchi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B8A21F86BE for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZofsBLV+XA1s for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BAB21F86B9 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shtsuchi@cisco.com; l=737; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1346315611; x=1347525211; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=XCk7KD8rBVAbXuDRhy/8S5bDxYy70y2ZRCgGFsjHytE=; b=lXMFhEzs/7GGA+bMHk9FkA8i/EHVFN5mNKMd1KGSKUnfjopiwrysWYYB MxXOTUOnM5Z9j8CprCOwggjHlteKlRiGCJUlExlieYthoLTPnVHicqmT0 sOnBbBr3eKOa7whZlyBuZsSvv4dAFzI9yz6uefN2TVQOGHcv8pmE/7mw3 w=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,338,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="7685672"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2012 08:33:30 +0000
Received: from [10.141.32.140] (dhcp-10-141-32-140.cisco.com [10.141.32.140]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7U8XSLj001392; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:33:29 GMT
Message-ID: <503F2558.3080501@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:33:28 +0900
From: Shishio Tsuchiya <shtsuchi@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: softwires@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Softwires] MAP-E interop/functionaly test by JANOG
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:33:32 -0000

WG
JANOG(JApan Network Operator Group) has MAP-E interoperability test plan 24-26th October at Nagaoka,Niigata.
When the previous JANOG meeting, we did test 4rd(draft-murakami-softwire-4rd) and I published the result as internet draft.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-janog-softwire-report-00

The documents includes
-Implementation report of 3 vendors(FNSC,IIJ and IPinfusion)
-IPv4 functionality over IPv6
 Protocol level testing such as VPN and ICMP.
 Application level test such as messanger,VoIP and Video,we refered RFC6586.
 NAT verification tool result such as STUN and NAT-analyzer.
-interoperability result

If we have recommendation of test method on NAT environment , please let me know.

Regards,
-Shishio