[Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments && DS-Lite/NAT64 experiments
<xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com> Thu, 07 April 2011 05:30 UTC
Return-Path: <xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E913A69F5 for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.242
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.242 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.328, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BqpalEro8P3D for <softwires@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216A13A6863 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 09462FC4003 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:31:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4F8FC4001 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:31:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ch-mailsrv.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.250.27]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:31:46 +0200
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBF4E5.14569CDF"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:31:42 +0800
Message-ID: <0962B0BEF842A24191AD9BE41A8DD2FC0168525A@ch-mailsrv.rd.francetelecom.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments && DS-Lite/NAT64 experiments
Thread-Index: Acv0dqpjDSVsZIxJQe6Yllay01rTEgAXyLQgAAPMEyA=
From: xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com
To: softwires@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2011 05:31:46.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[15EE2D90:01CBF4E5]
Subject: [Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments && DS-Lite/NAT64 experiments
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:30:24 -0000
We have tested how applications behave when it has both DS-Lite IPv4 and NAT64 IPv6 (but not native IPv6). Firefox, IE, Skype, Google Earth v5.2.1, Live Messenger, uTorrent, BitComet, were on our test list. Despres,regarding your question ( maybe not answering your question exactly as we tested NAT64 IPv6 instead of native IPv6 ), uTorrent v2.2 used IPv6 for login/authentication but IPv4 for the data exchange, for IPv6 peer was not able to talk to IPv4 peer. Although BitComet v1.23 issued both A and AAAA quires, it completely ignored AAAA RR and only used IPv4 for communication. Please also see some of other test results below. DS-Lite/NAT64 experiments could be documented if it is of interests. Tested Apps IPv4/IPv6 portion Firefox (Non-vedio) v3.6.12 All IPv6 video website Half/ half IE (Non-vedio) v6.0 All IPv6 Skype v5.0 Major IPv6 Google Earth v5.2.1 Major IPv6 Live Messenger 2009 Major IPv4 uTorrent v2.2 Major IPv4 BitComet v1.23 All IPv4 BR, Xiaohong opensource A+P: http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/ ________________________________ 发件人: Rémi Després [mailto:remi.despres@free.fr] 发送时间: 2011年4月7日 0:21 收件人: DENG Xiaohong ESP/PEK 抄送: int-area@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments Thank you, Xiahong, for sharing this interesting information. In the case of BitComet and uTorrent, I wonder what happens if the host has both A+P IPv4 and IPv6, as opposed to just A+P IPv4. Did you try that? Regards, RD Le 6 avr. 2011 à 10:57, <xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com> <xiaohong.deng@orange-ftgroup.com> a écrit : Dear all, An I-D about stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 experiments has been submitted. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-aplusp-experiment-results-00 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-aplusp-experiment-results-00> . A website introducing the detail of experiment results is also accessible via: http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/ <http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/> BR, Xiaohong _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
- [Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 … xiaohong.deng
- Re: [Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-I… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-I… Tina Tsou
- Re: [Softwires] FW:[Int-area] Stateless IPv4-in-I… xiaohong.deng