Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-01.txt
"Qi Sun" <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Sun, 18 March 2012 16:24 UTC
Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6601F21F8547 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ON-a5LRRUuGy for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB5D21F8535 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so9619832iaz.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:reply-to:subject:references:x-priority:x-guid :x-mailer:mime-version:message-id:content-type; bh=vO3iCA/ySWGn27Eb5nHmzSywq57EczQZbXWoYmYe+JM=; b=JnMQ7Gkows/F/7TPKvC1NI2yybyHRB8TFqBixWZquqTtbEtIIgakUSn/QwHWZutZDk U7mOTN1mPYo49TPnQyaJxKwBd3y8cZUIs7kt7Eq3B5933hPuYfzPvR+vdSv9nbZI3j8k kgO20UusrYf3L9zaPTW7GpQODWHvhxuFAHDk3g3wNzeOZ9YBRBmJsou7VXJKnIjWJEOX Nq0LGnEfDqV+rLo0f0nO2FZsv9uGz8r0MmGbD0oXU4cqyUHYg1EYLcU+XmbS7WDdboE6 dMdXXqxy05h2U0ohLx39DCQRQGiiNkor2GKg2kV/n0ZI2Vn/1V1UWM0gVZgk5Jv0KSOs 8rmw==
Received: by 10.50.203.99 with SMTP id kp3mr4091662igc.16.1332087845540; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunqi ([59.64.255.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ba4sm6058723igb.14.2012.03.18.09.24.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:24:00 +0800
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
To: Wojciech Dec <wdec@cisco.com>
References: <CB7FE846.1BC66%wdec@cisco.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 44340008-BE17-4784-A05E-AD7A547944D5
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.83[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <201203190023599479803@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart816511361427_=----"
Cc: softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-01.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "sunqi.csnet.thu" <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:24:07 -0000
Hi Wojciech, The draft gives out a great support for the MAP mechanism and is nicely written. Here are some confusions while I’m reading the draft. Please help me with understanding :-) 1, In section 7.4, the 4th paragraph: Otherwise, the IPv6 destination address (IPv4-translateable address) MUST be derived from the received IPv4 destination address per DMR. The destination port number MUST be unchanged. Considering the IPv6 destination address is derived from the received IPv4 destination address per DMR, why the IPv6 destination address is an IPv4-translatable address, not IPv4-converted address? 2, In section 7.5 At the CE, the IPv4 source address MUST be derived from the IPv6 source address (IPv6-converted address) as per the DMR, or as per the FMR. The source port number MUST be unchanged. IPv4 Destination Address and Destination Port Number: At the CE, the IPv4 destination address MUST be derived from the IPv6 destination address (IPv6-translatable address) as per BMR. The destination port number MUST be unchanged. What is an IPv6- converted address and IPv6-translatable address? I’m a little lost here… 3, In section 6.2.1 The IPv6 source and destination addresses MUST then be derived as per Section 6 of this draft, and….. IMHO the super link “Section 6” may be “Section 7”, referring to section 6.4.1 and 6.4.2. Did I understand right? There are the same super link in section 6.2.2. Please correct me if I misunderstood anything. Best Regards! Qi Sun From: Wojciech Dec Date: 2012-03-10 00:03 To: softwires@ietf.org Subject: [Softwires] New Version Notification for draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-01.txt Hi All A new version of I-D, draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-01.txt has been posted under: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-01 Filename: draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation Revision: 01 Title: MAP Translation (MAP-T) - specification Creation date: 2012-03-09 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 22 Abstract: This document specifies the "Mapping of Address and Port" (MAP) double stateless translation based solution (MAP-T) for providing IPv4 hosts connectivity to and across an IPv6 domain. We welcome further WG feedback. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires