Re: [Softwires] MAP-E 1:1 for HA

Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 13 November 2012 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0914321F85E1 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:46:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XjvFoE+BjniN for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD9321F85DB for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:46:06 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag0FAINNolCQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABEwDCDRoEIgh8BAQQSARQTPxAFBkZXBiQRh2iZeY9lkDCSFGEDpFSBa4Jw
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6894"; a="9542691"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2012 13:46:04 +0000
Received: from dhcp-lys01-vla250-10-147-112-107.cisco.com (dhcp-lys01-vla250-10-147-112-107.cisco.com [10.147.112.107]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qADDk3pl018919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:46:04 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <2012111321152612549156@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:46:03 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <78D8DB5C-06B4-433C-8F6F-2AE648C9FA87@employees.org>
References: <42004742-C524-4E0E-9129-6014DA196E97@employees.org> <E3FAB1F4F41F3A45B287E8D9C53522FD453B92E3@PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com> <CAH3bfABg970A-iWfh7qpitqY6RVsTP=4g-MfrtdWtT8q5GP4xQ@mail.gmail.com>, <0A6072E9-8A10-439D-8CCC-EA1B99C0EA2E@gmail.com> <2012111315564298406823@gmail.com>, <354EF357-BEC8-40D5-9C13-97CA55597A0D@gmail.com> <2012111321152612549156@gmail.com>
To: chenycmx <chenycmx@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP-E 1:1 for HA
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:46:09 -0000

> [Yuchi] Actually there is a 'binding' table on the AFTR, which maintains matching between v4 A+P and v6 A, and there's no 'mapping with address and port' in DS-Lite or Lw4over6 as in MAP. The main point here is not about the literal difference between 'binding' and 'mapping', but the difference between decoupling v4 & v6 and coupling v4 & v6.

let us assume we have a 1.1.1.0/24 for address sharing available with 256 ports per user.

in MAP 1:1 you'd have:
  1.1.1.1:01/40 -> 2001:db8::1
  1.1.1.1:02/40 -> 2001:db8::2
  1.1.1.1:03/40 -> 2001:db8::3
  .
  .
  .

  64K rules.

in MAP aggregated mode you have:
  1.1.1.0/24 -> 2001:db8:XXXX::/48

can you please show how the LW46 rules / binding /mapping whatever you call them look like for 1:1 mode?

cheers,
Ole