Re: [Softwires] ietf-softwire: IPv4 + PSID primary key for lw4over6 binding

Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com> Wed, 13 July 2016 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wingo@igalia.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72312DA85 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OBaqWqe0rw0f for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-sasl2.pobox.com [64.147.108.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A75312DB04 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1BE25C8A; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uPi6TqOAI7VApfY0QOOpkHJT3dE=; b=lwZfVx eSqIYPE6uaApKQeULt0qxzVOn28uGlb9RJHGmhfOe2TqmAtPshm5JO5KVMj3soKH PGUffDvxWWGMZ/gKZ99R6s74D/79eZQBcgRxzqFUk7NA9+APYqIhOh3xsWi1orsv PXhYLeuJ6mfdUUMAV0r6DBMIprmyLgAQ7UzsM=
Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4498125C88; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rusty (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86EE025C87; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:49:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
References: <877fcrcfl4.fsf@igalia.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008DE5EB3@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <87oa63auoe.fsf@igalia.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008DE5F5E@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:49:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008DE5F5E@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> (mohamed boucadair's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2016 13:07:43 +0000")
Message-ID: <877fcpa8zu.fsf@igalia.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 001B9042-4909-11E6-A790-28A6F1301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/YJpEiSUFlD-_-7FR_YSJexZkVtg>
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] ietf-softwire: IPv4 + PSID primary key for lw4over6 binding
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:49:34 -0000

Hi Monhamed,

On Tue 12 Jul 2016 15:07, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> writes:

>>               list binding-entry {
>>                 key "binding-ipv6info";
>>                 description "binding entry";
>>                 uses binding-entry;
>>               }
>> 
>> was that "binding-ipv6info" uniquely identifies the B4 (because it's a
>> key within the binding-entry list).  Is that not the case?
>
> [Med] "binding-ipv6info" uniquely identifies an entry, ** not ** a
> B4. The B4 is identified by applying, for example, a subscriber-mask
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7785#section-3). That is, a filter on
> all "binding-ipv6info" that belong, e.g., to the same /56.

I see, thank you.  If I understand you correctly, you are saying that to
have multiple softwires that a B4 should terminate those softwires with
distinct IPv6 addresses.  From the AFTR perspective this restriction is
not neccessary but if you find it useful, sure.

Andy