Re: [Softwires] 3gpp related comments on draft-dec-stateless-4v6-02

? 2011/7/29 19:18, Hui Deng ??:
> Hi Cameron.
>
>     Right now, i feel like it would be easier for the IETF to just define
>     NAT464 in general and stateless translation 4V6 is a flavor of NAT464.
>
>     I understand the allure of stateless.  But, IMHO the address
>     multiplexing of stateful is very useful and many large SPs already run
>     this way, and that operational experience is very important.  The IPv6
>     transition space is becoming very crowded, i personally would like to
>     see more work to make IPv6 a true replacement for IPv4 instead of yet
>     another transition mechanism that meets some set for checkboxs.
>
> ==> stateless 464 is good in his own environment, it may not be able 
> to compatible with NAT64 or others, stateful 464 has advantage which 
> could work with others, will see.

FYI, the dIVI 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xli-behave-divi/https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xli-behave-divi/)
and dIVI-PD (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xli-behave-divi-pd/) 
models are fully compatiple with stateless NAT64, i.e. RFC6052 and RFC6145.

Regards,

xing

> -Hui
>
>     This architecture is complicated.
>
>     CB
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires