Re: [Softwires] MAP draft 11 question on fragment ID space reduction

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531C81A88CC for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQApRDN77vol for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61D551A87B1 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EA31B83C7 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5E453E079; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.63] (71.201.198.58) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:54:22 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0629F4B.20A7A8%rajiva@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:54:17 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <8B98BAD4-A992-4F81-8207-6B4A42F1AC45@nominum.com>
References: <CAPi140MdbJQBLSRS+g4Jx0G1zm1dx6PLBBQ7oPeALU2z-Vp81g@mail.gmail.com> <A9F4CC49-3409-482E-8DD1-D60770719370@employees.org> <365F683D-89D6-4A42-B9F1-780453D9C1A5@nominum.com> <D0629F4B.20A7A8%rajiva@cisco.com>
To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.201.198.58]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/fBQ4rtulb6P51v9l2Vp7ciga630
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP draft 11 question on fragment ID space reduction
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:54:23 -0000

On Oct 14, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) <rajiva@cisco.com> wrote:
> It might be worth understanding why this problem is even worth
> addressing/mentioning.

This was in the document, so I commented on it.   I don't know what the original motivation was for adding it.   I would be okay with simply removing the text if the authors and WG agree that it's not necessary.