[Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5549 (5253)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 02 February 2018 21:08 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1EF1276AF for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:08:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b_nv-m5aRr3C for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 732321243FE for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 91781B8128E; Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:08:50 -0800 (PST)
To: flefauch@cisco.com, erosen@cisco.com, suresh@kaloom.com, terry.manderson@icann.org, ianfarrer@gmx.com, cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: shyam.ioml@gmail.com, softwires@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180202210850.91781B8128E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 13:08:50 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/g-8wisOnxSA32HT0Uc7VY1n4lPM>
Subject: [Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5549 (5253)
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 21:08:53 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5549, "Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5253 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Shyam Sethuram <shyam.ioml@gmail.com> Section: 6.2 Original Text ------------- Length of Next Hop Network Address = 16 (or 32) Corrected Text -------------- Length of Next Hop Network Address = 24 (or 48) Notes ----- The lengths should include the RD length also, right ? Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5549 (draft-ietf-softwire-v4nlri-v6nh-02) -------------------------------------- Title : Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop Publication Date : May 2009 Author(s) : F. Le Faucheur, E. Rosen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Softwires Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Softwires] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5549 (… RFC Errata System