Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01.txt
Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com> Wed, 27 June 2012 04:56 UTC
Return-Path: <bingxuere@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DE521F85BB for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2b5ZzND9nxmo for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E8921F8494 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so987324obb.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=MsL3AAX+rdiNiA2rmfCZM4pTNbJCNGHeW4R4D91Y28A=; b=CJiFINthJDfiULjEt2qWHF2rQPTktXkcbptP1eFMwsuzOylRNcHOX6Zx+TwTUBgC1e OzU3/Jvd8sS08kqy9+Lpr8EMzsYny8bvrijD2nQE2qOLnWrraJrUPjTcGI/XpoFfhorc TveQqu/IqcFN50OxsQExP8tTSTN8nT4bG0kKmTU4ei7fC0qv5pCMEgnqcEfjzQG44JcY ymn36GvuTxbmCHSbnBZGTk5SgnFU3omWGC7NqNOayR3qg99/XXkr4GsDcYRp8J41YeAm a1XFrBxEFjSH8q6h4ntwiAWGSZBFaLUSEKVmkxSboBs0b8r+EH0FK7ugQ7dsRg2G+MkO g1UA==
Received: by 10.60.18.114 with SMTP id v18mr18918424oed.34.1340773008297; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.139.107 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EA33B308B5@SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <20120624054808.18705.88312.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFUBMqXpm-BJXSeNWMLU7uR0=vqVajvfdX7tj3O9tApv-MTvVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFFjW4j1VV_GhkgqXe=5keXjToSp-qi91XWCy-V_tF54NYsdZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFUBMqV_WOpniOUGSwxqp4bo8raZ4bem0Qkz0-_PG2K4J8yyhA@mail.gmail.com> <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EA33B308B5@SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:56:08 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH3bfAArMa+7x4HxWJUDpZw4JSuLC6cpwBpCAXmmpHeKUiBD1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0444eba5e250c004c36d0a7b"
Cc: Softwires-wg <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:56:51 -0000
Hi Leaf, On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com> wrote: > I might have a naive question: why does the Softtwire-WG need a document > for deployment other than a document for motivation? > Qiong: We already have a motivation draft that clearly demenstrates the requirements. This is exactly what is documented in charter: "develop a protocol specification response to the solution motivation document" > > I guess the answer might be the motivation is for the requirements, and > the deployment is for the specified application cases, right? But to me the > answer might be as simple as that motivation is the deployment. > Qiong: Motivation is why we need it. Specification is what it is.Deployment is how we use it in operational network. These three are quite different essentially. > > Could it possible to merge these 2 document? > I don't think so. See above reasons. Best wishes Qiong > > > Best Regards, > Leaf > > > From: softwires-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Maoke > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 12:01 PM > To: Wojciech Dec > Cc: Softwires-wg > Subject: Re: [Softwires] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01.txt > > > 2012/6/26 Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> > Hi, > > comments: > > section 4.2 of the draft reads: > " a MAP domain is a set of MAP CEs and BRs connected to the same virtual > link. One MAP domain shares a common BR and has the same set of BMRs, FMRs > and DMR, and it can be further divided into multiple sub-domains when > multiple IPv4 subnets are deployed in one MAP domain. > There might be multiple BMRs in one MAP domain, and CE would pick up its > own BMR by longest prefix matching lookup. > > This effectively confirms that multiple MAP domains are an established > characteristics, and logic dictates that if N CEs can be in a given domain, > N can also equal 1. > > multiple domain is surely an established characteristics. however, the > question is: can N be 1/K (K:int > 1)? ;-) > > > We look forward to updates to the draft, also in terms of referring to the > specs. > > thanks a lot for the comment. and updating the draft with referring to the > specs is definitely the most important task but the first-priority task of > us is clarifying the semantics and impacts of the specs itself. > > thanks and regards, > maoke > > > Regards, > Woj. > On 26 June 2012 08:24, Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi all, > > we have submitted the updated version of the MAP deployment draft. As the > new draft of MAP spec introduces technical uncertainties and hasn't reach > the consensus. we noticed that the 1:1 mode involves different way of > operation, needing to carefully investigate and to understand. Currently we > exclude the 1:1 mode from the scope of MAP deployment. > > the major change of this version in comparison to the previous version > includes: > - adding of the new section 4.1: Network Models > taking the example of home network, explain what is the typical use > cases of MAP > - editorial changes and correction of grammar/wording/spellings. > > we are aware that this MAP deployment draft has not reviewed by the > working group, and therefore we update it still as individual draft for the > time being. comments and recommendations are requested. > > regards, > maoke > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > Date: 2012/6/24 > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01.txt > To: sunqiong@ctbri.com.cn > Cc: simon.perreault@viagenie.ca, fibrib@gmail.com, > tina.tsou.zouting@huawei.com, chengang@chinamobile.com, > chunfa.sun@g.softbank.co.jp > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Qiong Sun and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment > Revision: 01 > Title: Mapping of Address and Port (MAP) - Deployment > Considerations > Creation date: 2012-06-24 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 32 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01.txt > Status: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment > Htmlized: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01 > Diff: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-01 > > Abstract: > This document describes when and how an operator uses the technique > of Mapping of Address and Port (MAP) for the IPv4 residual deployment > in the IPv6-dominant domain. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > -- ============================================== Qiong Sun China Telecom Beijing Research Institude Open source code: lightweight 4over6: *http://sourceforge.net/projects/laft6/* PCP-natcoord:* http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcpportsetdemo/ * ===============================================