IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] Call for adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-02 as wg draft

Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> Tue, 10 July 2012 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <despres.remi@laposte.net>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A4D21F8579 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.573, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GS1xLieYnYGT for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp23.services.sfr.fr (smtp23.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF40D21F856D for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2309.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EDAFD700006B; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:28:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.73] (58.204.170.89.rev.sfr.net [89.170.204.58]) by msfrf2309.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0CD8470000B0; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:28:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-SFR-UUID: 20120710122840527.0CD8470000B0@msfrf2309.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-4-691383196"
From: Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAFUBMqWPpYuCQdKRB=Qgwoxfg5j7Ms4VVavQXo_zOcR4UA5uWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:28:39 +0200
Message-Id: <D22A1288-9B02-4128-8EAD-3F63B73D7E55@laposte.net>
References: <4FF7563E.2000101@ericsson.com> <98C96596-304C-46E7-A854-5A25E81C4C79@laposte.net> <CAFUBMqWPpYuCQdKRB=Qgwoxfg5j7Ms4VVavQXo_zOcR4UA5uWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Call for adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-02 as wg draft
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:28:15 -0000

2012-07-10 13:03, Maoke :

> hi Remi,
> 
> 2012/7/10 Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net>
> Hi, Suresh,
> 
> This draft contains valuable advices which can apply to 4rd as well as to MAP-T+E, but is exclusively MAP oriented.
> 
> surely it is a MAP-oriented stuff as only the MAP-T+E are considered right now as the deployment paradigm in the draft. therefore i don't think it should wait 4rd being chosen for standardization. 
> 
> on the other hand, were 4rd rather than MAP chosen for standardization in the future, this deployment draft might be deprecated or its contents might be re-used and revised for 4rd deployment.

Well, if this understanding is shared by the chairs, please consider that my objection to have this draft as WG document now is without object. 
A confirmation of this understanding will however be appreciated if it is the right one.

Thanks,
RD



> no matter what the result would be, i don't see any problem of dealing that in the framework of a WG document. 
> 
> hope you may consider over this again. thanks!
> 
> - maoke
>  
> As such, I find it premature to move it to WG-draft status.
> 
> If 4rd is chosen for standardization, adapting this deployment draft to it looks easy.
> I therefore suggest to keep it as is  for the time being (while pursuing discussion on its contents).
> 
> Regards,
> RD
> 
> 
> Le 2012-07-06 à 23:18, Suresh Krishnan a écrit :
> 
> > Hi all,
> >  This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
> > consensus towards adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-02 as a
> > softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the
> > adoption by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also
> > state your objections in your response. The call will complete at
> > midnight PDT on 2012-07-20.
> >
> > Regards
> > Suresh & Yong
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Softwires mailing list
> > Softwires@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email