[Softwires] Closing draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 10 February 2012 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F3D21F8635 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:20:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.159
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.159 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mFbZvkywOSqQ for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A8B21F8627 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:20:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 57F8422C214 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:20:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from puexch31.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.29]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 3A7534C024 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:20:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.7]) by puexch31.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.29]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:20:36 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:20:35 +0100
Thread-Topic: Closing draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation
Thread-Index: Aczn21W/hfX703LqT+Se3UHnpEkFmwAAIHyw
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35BC477AC05@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20120210100349.14509.19188.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120210100349.14509.19188.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.2.10.70319
Subject: [Softwires] Closing draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:20:40 -0000

Dear WG members, 

I would like to close this document so that we can meet the following item from the WG Charter:

"
4. Developments for stateless legacy IPv4 carried over IPv6
- develop a solution motivation document to be published as an
RFC
- develop a protocol specification response to the solution
motivation document; this work item will not be taken through
Working Group last call until the solution motivation document
has been published or approved for publication 
"

Except the a comment asking to include a new section to compare stateful vs. stateless, no further comments have been received.

I didn't considered adding the proposed new section because IMO it is out of scope of this document. That section can justify in its own a dedicated draft.

As for the next step, I see two options:

(1) Either issue a WG LC, or
(2) Withdraw the document and update the WG charter.

WG members, please advise.

Cheers,
Med