Re: [lamps] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-06: (with COMMENT)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F226131178 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBx2hVOD6Q7E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA011131187 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2323300A1E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:54:46 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id DfFRWYYP2wMM for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-71-127-50-4.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.127.50.4]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81664300433; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:54:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <152952052147.28497.2774061835582572120.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:54:46 -0400
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis@ietf.org, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A293ED9-7D98-4CE3-94B0-D722ED176336@vigilsec.com>
References: <152952052147.28497.2774061835582572120.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/0e6IE01frxaT44T_DJARY6gm8zg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5750-bis-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:01:33 -0000


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> It seems a bit odd that Appendix B recommends that RFC 2312 be made historic,
> because that already happened.
> 

Ooops.  Thanks for catching that.

Russ