IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] discussing EST CSRATTRS specifying the SAN at IETF111

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Tue, 06 July 2021 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812523A3216; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ui6tmhTNdr6; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4FD63A31C6; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1002::5c6] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1002:0:0:0:5c6]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 166J0uvA088349 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 21:00:57 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1625598057; bh=ZdtjHtQd92EAhZQgeJ8XIa3U3KajrwVISE1e78+LFqU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=sfShMzzrPzs1D127IwzkQDkfnjWjvtHmndKmUubTSyo1aKlwiI1shcRaaP8g4XrOQ 7/ELV0KSn155g4q6Q2nUhk+8/K7YIiA/Oag++iyocOQfYSqxmxl67ddRgHlVnCYk2u Ew44VI7botzSscf6I75dvc0toDojMHp4xu6gRD7w=
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: David von Oheimb <nl0@von-Oheimb.de>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>, anima@ietf.org, Uri Blumenthal <uri@ll.mit.edu>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
References: <83844291-5785-434E-8956-3FF81ECD761C@cisco.com> <9820.1618358856@localhost> <MW3PR11MB47462121627A10A62E006497DB369@MW3PR11MB4746.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <26435.1623269725@localhost> <25C432F7-EDEE-4FEA-B871-5D7F9311BBF7@sn3rd.com> <6e29b64d-0bc0-d129-beff-4072a482cfbd@von-Oheimb.de> <401152E2-9743-48FB-A3E1-3DE6873AE0A3@vigilsec.com> <31102501-F25D-4763-869B-3AD4165454BD@ll.mit.edu> <ff866861-551b-fdb2-792f-6d5d819f27bf@von-Oheimb.de> <529b66d9-1216-5e65-eb28-79a2de09d6a4@lear.ch> <13163.1625579947@localhost> <BA4F83CF-B611-46A9-8E86-78A5E029A8A6@vigilsec.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Message-ID: <e7984f8f-fd99-32b3-6922-8c6a6851b430@lear.ch>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 21:00:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BA4F83CF-B611-46A9-8E86-78A5E029A8A6@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oSk5ueQFQhTMrfkuPnfe7FBoOhN4Uq1dr"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/1otmtnzB9WfABHLmLao0qNVLtxg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] discussing EST CSRATTRS specifying the SAN at IETF111
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 19:01:21 -0000

So voluntold.

On 06.07.21 20:44, Russ Housley wrote:
>
>> LAMPS chairs: can we have ten minutes for this discussion on the Thursday
>>       Session III meeting at IETF111?
>>       The Monday Session II is conflicted with ANIMA.
>>
>> I'm gonna voluntold Eliot to lead this discussion :-)
> Yes, I'll add it.
>
> Russ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email