IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Logo carrying certificate profile for email` draft

Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Tue, 08 May 2018 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2240C127137 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 00:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WM63DlkzjVOp for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2018 00:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157BD1270A7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2018 00:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c5-v6so13332003itj.1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 May 2018 00:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UbHT0Z75xgUhuwPQ9mInDGxf82czQbXBx3bSmxJmgps=; b=NOg0pGVt3AtNfDG9NNQeS19YyhvZUUAURPbjDAyu3XdYA9EDm8paFwm6gLKKnwG8Pr w/uouSacdmUyxMXJSh5vvKBipzqIunOpqOkOE/Wdc78GrBPJSwEkOSyYCj5CRtAukC5J lWbNqinLhRjiAh/H3M6UV09stnb45gKl2+V5vnEoCqsbNkPOpcq0LJYgBLvFssw5piva wh44taQB4h/uGyUrtN9Z11aoIuiLe29q/4UikayOIuxoNmvBbWcRWU9lKaGYS8gQvMy+ 9+F5kbznuemz6DKAzqs+YpA+gWLUzjdF+0jllrwKD2XdJUfkKF2oCLWMXtG1XuMckoBW I8/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UbHT0Z75xgUhuwPQ9mInDGxf82czQbXBx3bSmxJmgps=; b=anBgwbMovDQh1VtMyqha6ggG8OX0Dovr3wm8+DEqlQ8M4mkKgNrrvNW8xjS2iED7yK aON9Z/UY0G2HNNPIJDnzYhWVJo7Y0rej1R+deuwe9LWcJADYlsVtVAHEqbbNIslRVK4Y gjlqWktouapyhnYOaZvwX75VBikseCqynNBd3EYM1NSazNkN0UFIQtPsn1o/BwMN4tvC imhrOEkvZLfqJ4rdksoLpNlLbr5/5KHM6jMKm3vqUW1p5ABfuUFjDRu2Tusf2wblkR5G OHZsdDpOGgqnnsJ8lp3OE2VleACJGqvOmoVcpW9Aarxm5txkM2r+tWGhXMg3HKqd/6hl XJ1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcixhs75D6541ElAzKe/aSycRXgZx1d+qpbhkwt9VXqwufRvolV 7Rt1na0Nplk4t04qEBh6eShfPfiYf6viVENz3lQP15rfLQs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp+AyCz8csyZtbB2buH8tptwNk3bHVOn3Q0HpE5tXCEzzBs0ruSM69zMWiKguv+VVXxHxpl6vx8Bm3gfSI4qWg=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:de07:: with SMTP id d7-v6mr4916820itg.93.1525762931689; Tue, 08 May 2018 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 07:02:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK2YCAQGPomunWv3CELDmKUYGN7phZN3=3+xr9cVQe7JwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="0000000000009739b8056bac5de5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/2N9MJBN1EfqElwhCLjwXkieP1Bk>
Subject: [lamps] Logo carrying certificate profile for email` draft
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 07:02:15 -0000

Hi all,

I've posted a draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chuang-bimi-certificate/ regarding a
logo carrying certificate for authenticated email using domain based
methods (DKIM and SPF).  In particular this draft calls for a new Extended
Key Usage for these certificates to help distinguish this usage from other
profiles such as S/MIME.  Can this draft be considered for the LAMPS
rechartering?  This work is being done by a Brand Indicator for Message
Identification (BIMI) working group.  An early version of the overall
protocol can be seen at
https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification/
though that version doesn't include changes that include X.509
certificates.

thanks,
-Wei

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email