Re: [lamps] LAMPS sample keys and certificates

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 19 December 2019 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9677120077 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:32:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQx4i2gr97cB for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 001F412001A for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:32:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD43300B23 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:32:29 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ab2fz1qfaERI for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:32:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-198-163.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.198.163]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05ED23001CC for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:32:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:32:28 -0500
References: <878sodm0j3.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <878sodm0j3.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Message-Id: <23953F0E-F919-4BBD-998F-11FF0DDBD95F@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/4DkCDvMBERvpa2v9NBgi4rnDm3c>
Subject: Re: [lamps] LAMPS sample keys and certificates
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 23:32:33 -0000

All:

We set a goal at IETF 106 of learning how different user agents handle the two approaches to header protection.  I would like to see reports on the mail list so that we can choose a way forward.  Please help!

Russ


> On Nov 18, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi all--
> 
> I've just published:
> 
>   https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dkg-lamps-samples-00.html
> 
> This draft contains sample X.509v3 certificates, and corresponding
> secret keys for a sample CA, and for two e-mail users, Alice and Bob.
> It provides the certificates and keys in PEM-encoded form and (for Alice
> and Bob) in PKCS#12 bundles, so they should be relatively easy to
> import.
> 
> My hope is that they are useful for generating and interpreting sample
> S/MIME (CMS) messages, and part of a larger plan to generate test
> vectors that will be useful in demonstrating protected header behavior
> on existing clients.
> 
> I'd appreciate any feedback or suggestions on the draft and the sample
> keys and certificates and PKCS#12 files.
> 
> I'm currently building the draft from the git repo at
> https://gitlab.com/dkg/lamps-samples -- editorial patches, issues, etc
> are welcome at the gitlab interface, though i would prefer if any
> substantive issues are also addressed to the list here.
> 
>   --dkg