Re: [lamps] FW: Draft minutes for IETF103

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 06 November 2018 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A8012D4F1 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:21:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9lxgJORYiW9 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9BF21277C8 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:21:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E61300A44 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 04:21:01 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Ry454I552KFh for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 04:21:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8a9b.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.138.155]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88C98300523; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 04:20:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <E43D7CA5-8D72-4170-B9D9-77A75A58BD05@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_09E01DF9-7980-451C-9083-D8D5AA5F843B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 04:20:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <D144004A-79E6-4930-A251-1DC20A8D5DE4@akamai.com>
Cc: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <CD261ECA-7AB3-420C-B475-DED15883A32B@akamai.com> <D144004A-79E6-4930-A251-1DC20A8D5DE4@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/4xYVEDBY2kCIVxGJFiKvRmDlsxM>
Subject: Re: [lamps] FW: Draft minutes for IETF103
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 09:21:06 -0000

Thanks for the notes.  I see one minor typo: s/ X509 certificages/ X.509 certificates/

Russ


> On Nov 5, 2018, at 10:32 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> I keep forgetting that the mailing list name wasn’t changed when the WG name changed.  Sigh.
>  
> From: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com <mailto:rsalz@akamai.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:06 AM
> To: "lamps@ietf.org <mailto:lamps@ietf.org>" <lamps@ietf.org <mailto:lamps@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Draft minutes for IETF103
>  
> See attached.  Please post corrections to the list.
>  
> <lamps-minutes.txt>