IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Re: [IANA #1455573] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-kem (SMI Security for PKIX Module Identifier)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 11 July 2026 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C62811503E94 for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2026 05:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1783772097; bh=MoXMxJDVglsWoOggDpz0EsHi61MFpye1E5QeIJCF0qY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=GEijcNFGLkWNowrTB1h8fcWA0DWHXd/ZElAR8mQpunZpggoA3Bq4FbGnkiyhkDk3Y tvitn4CZ6hVoNviW8gqjwU1mk58InxEJO+EAto8L4NHPvOaOvXkKYm0uoeMCiV/Lxe 26UbhAUpFg37A+5OlaJv33/ZBSeoasf+ZiBNvCKY=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id prWtrknkMBF3 for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2026 05:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D469011503E76 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2026 05:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53EF1A0B74; Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:14:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [72.138.80.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372F61A1909; Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:14:56 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.600.51.1.1\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-869935-1783731239-585.1455573-9-0@icann.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 08:14:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D5C0ECBB-5B25-45D5-836C-FFE89F29A763@vigilsec.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1455573@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-478995-1783466053-1429.1455573-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-869935-1783731239-585.1455573-9-0@icann.org>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.600.51.1.1)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=MoXMxJDVglsWoOggDpz0EsHi61MFpye1E5QeIJCF0qY=; b=qmnJ1zDLWjfMhZwdIEcmzZV9Yb4klwtpXgC8Mr1XWTZgaYw5r5JfFV4PVbWVUfdCQAI/iU+on53LQOw1I26NjSot1IKCuOgaANPH5dyboy7LtA0u3410lL+pXmABSRIWBr6d/367Pck5sTVEg71gdj5m1ttJGC2uXzvTj70ulFEyKp7NWqp2EexwewGTkuv1fKj5c1vnzjCLDkmNicrCuZlf8PCZoxMIeYMlcYD28Mhe01vrNd6pYTZiKSCoLo1oBC4dkhxT7PzsFyeF8VcPlaLoJ4qgBXEiLPmP4uas4akZcvF+xZRNXIuRdEK62ZYCcZfcKQYqNNY7ekw7bP/THQ==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09
Message-ID-Hash: PN2MXECEU567JILMSHCXCCD45EFPXD6F
X-Message-ID-Hash: PN2MXECEU567JILMSHCXCCD45EFPXD6F
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, IETF LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: [IANA #1455573] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-kem (SMI Security for PKIX Module Identifier)
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/9wU0Krfxs4KZ9BWRudgTBB6RY8A>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

Yes, please make the module identifier assignment for id-mod-composite-mlkem-2025.

Russ


> On Jul 10, 2026, at 8:53 PM, David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Russ Housley, Sean Turner (cc: lamps WG),
> 
> As the designated experts for the SMI Security for PKIX Module Identifier registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-kem-17 for us? The other registrations have already been made.
> 
> Please see
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-kem/
> 
> The due date is July 24th.
> 
> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/
> 
> When the review is complete (or, if you have concerns that need to be addressed, when the initial review is complete), we'll update the Datatracker's "IANA expert review" state and send any comments to the authors. Unless you ask us to wait for other reviewers, we'll act on the first review we receive.
> 
> With thanks,
> 
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list -- spasm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to spasm-leave@ietf.org

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status