IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [Spasm] Erratum 4988

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 14 June 2017 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DD4127010 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8UTg7ZH5TnaP for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ADC9128BA2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v5E0gX31029371; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 01:42:51 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Rk+GEBAOMp0xD09ZmzLolNXMWLamVVibbMsrP3JnOZ4=; b=WZTgFIUDNyaUL/z/TdIM77ckM5BygFyFrjGChlDjwIHdrYRcbtYgVMn4oeJFUgYvGUoH WNQ2j3XTXmKPb6cIpCspAy77Rgsgn/rG/2hxTD/98h5dl5W9pGI21+/IHfF/VXUGPCDo ZgQU6odpmS0SIYHZSuwVVRSs4w9KEc0p274V129nNQj6XieeLMNSMjZE2yPyvZoYK32T eQH/dm9EKbblA3oN5c8rf8S3M2PIdCWiqxXWCfyC3ZmWOf9wOd+Trj92nSec1yNiUYCY /StwE7Z4DdRTELGWMr0R0i0O17SEZvKyV2rb18trjElSvRA56ShRtQjPgN+HdczSBXuR Vg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (a184-51-33-18.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2b2nb29tkk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 01:42:51 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v5E0esJe017346; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:42:49 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2b0c3um3vy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:42:49 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:42:49 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:42:49 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <jsha@eff.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
CC: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] [Spasm] Erratum 4988
Thread-Index: AQHS3ilYogFLC+R7ukilGRln4U1clKIXFg8AgAEMMwCAACcagIAK3YMAgAAnhACAAAaxgIAALvsAgAAN0yA=
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:42:48 +0000
Message-ID: <817edd56793e454aaa9759ba6ba03809@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <3c0da781-2586-647e-7332-c7233dd9570d@eff.org> <CAMm+Lwg-AsOFB6ga1WnB5sTRBDYf73Xz=zPsw92fec5Osu53vQ@mail.gmail.com> <edee7fe7-8dab-6309-d33e-1a9512fdb19e@eff.org> <CAMm+LwgsZ2p1yLYfBRNevPmW0-c9TPzKEMp8efget5R2Q3J7kw@mail.gmail.com> <d0edd474-c339-c9fb-dae1-3af0974d6dcc@eff.org> <CAMm+Lwg-esZjNAu+mm8j2Uk-u1hT_0Q33YkcuB3P4-rQ5woSfQ@mail.gmail.com> <021b346f-966e-377b-a242-73d3613921b0@eff.org> <CAMm+LwirmKYA2q8ug4RMEVpnAoyzp62mEZb5DmgS34D2jZPRBQ@mail.gmail.com> <81cfd21c-e46a-29a3-d667-6e1b4a4bbbca@eff.org>
In-Reply-To: <81cfd21c-e46a-29a3-d667-6e1b4a4bbbca@eff.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.38.194]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-13_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706140010
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-06-13_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706140011
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/APuQS0V5LmGbhYmvcc6uUuJ1ynU>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [Spasm] Erratum 4988
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:43:02 -0000

> > So maybe reword to explicitly state that if we have a CNAME chain like
> > that, CAs may set a processing limit (provided they declare it) ?
> This works for me, but we should include a MUST with a minimum number of
> CNAMEs to follow, e.g. 10.

Works for me.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email