[lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9481 (7800)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 07 February 2024 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06098C14F601 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:24:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLvEF6f7em01 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA60C14F68C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:24:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 54EF618F0F68; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:24:40 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com, hans.aschauer@siemens.com, mike.ounsworth@entrust.com, john.gray@entrust.com, spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240207172440.54EF618F0F68@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 09:24:40 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/AauLBSjOyckeysVANtBtkmCa9-A>
Subject: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9481 (7800)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 17:24:51 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9481,
"Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Algorithms".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7800

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>

Section: 6.2.3

Original Text
-------------
   The KMAC algorithm is defined in [RFC8702] and FIPS SP 800-185
   [NIST.SP.800-185]].

Corrected Text
--------------
   The KMAC algorithm is defined in [RFC8702] and NIST SP 800-185
   [NIST.SP.800-185].

Notes
-----
Correct two errors. First, the referenced document is a Special Publication, not a FIPS. Second, there are two closing brackets, but there should only be one.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC9481 (draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Algorithms
Publication Date    : November 2023
Author(s)           : H. Brockhaus, H. Aschauer, M. Ounsworth, J. Gray
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG