Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-08.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 29 November 2022 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC08C15258F for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:54:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pntCUshCqS3q for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88642C15258C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200BB1693CA for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:54:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 120BE1695EB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:54:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:54:04 -0500
References: <166975146176.22395.18427826787808974221@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <166975146176.22395.18427826787808974221@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <BB1CA501-AAFF-483E-B446-82D234EAC68F@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Bn4W7HbNbquiFHWXZZfxX9zN7D8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-08.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:54:10 -0000

The address comments received from IESG Evaluation.  The biggest change is the addition of a paragraph about the reason that http:// is permitted for fetching logotypes.

Russ


> On Nov 29, 2022, at 2:51 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 Certificates
>        Authors         : Stefan Santesson
>                          Russ Housley
>                          Trevor Freeman
>                          Leonard Rosenthol
>  Filename        : draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-08.txt
>  Pages           : 46
>  Date            : 2022-11-29
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document specifies a certificate extension for including
>   logotypes in public key certificates and attribute certificates.
>   This document obsoletes RFC 3709 and RFC 6170.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-08.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-08
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts