[lamps] Header Protection Backward Compatibility Requirements
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 10 August 2019 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FDF12011C for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMZ5rI7eyw1B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A06120075 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB09300B00 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:12:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id BYs5XJYBIBi1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:12:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (unknown [138.88.156.37]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9243E3005DB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:12:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Message-Id: <A14B2AD3-8441-4DAB-B4DA-C1C2080B9A25@vigilsec.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:31:41 -0400
To: LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/CZydo39xVgjwVDa0cBm7TNICW-0>
Subject: [lamps] Header Protection Backward Compatibility Requirements
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 17:31:45 -0000
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection-requirements/ We started a discussion at IETF 105. The people in the room felt that further maillist discussion is needed to determine the backward compatibility requirements. Please continue that discussion. Russ
- [lamps] Header Protection Backward Compatibility … Russ Housley