Re: [lamps] Current efforts in the direction of draft-truskovsky-lamps-pq-hybrid-x509?

[Iyán Méndez Veiga <[e-mail]>]

Tim, John,

Thank you for your detail answers. I will definitely have to check the new 
draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonnell-lamps-chameleon-certs/

The composite certificates draft is also interesting, but I'm more interested 
in the backwards compatibility problem than the security level at the moment.

On Friday 7 July 2023 19:57:45 CEST Tim Hollebeek wrote:
> (...)
> There's been some talk of refreshing / updating the hybrid draft, but 
> nothing has come of it so far.  A lot of this is very much still a work in 
> progress, and people are still figuring things out, so be prepared for
> things to change as the working group continues to try to figure out these
> important questions.

Alright, I will keep an eye on the mail list.

On Friday 7 July 2023 21:30:14 CEST John Gray wrote:
> Iyán,
> 
> This is interesting timing,
> 
> Corey's message earlier today introduced our new draft, which is a slightly
> different approach to the Hybrid Catalyst problem:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonnell-lamps-chameleon-certs/   I
> copied his message below: 
> Cheers,

Best regards,
Iyán