Re: [lamps] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-algorithms-14: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

It dose, thanks.

//Zahed

> On 2 Jun 2022, at 10:57, Brockhaus, Hendrik <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Zaheduzzaman
> 
> Thank you for this comment.
> See my proposal I already proposed to Martin. I hope this solved also you issue.
> 
>> Von: Spasm <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> Im Auftrag von Zaheduzzaman Sarker
>> via Datatracker
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thanks for working on the updates.
>> 
>> This document is expected to be concise as far as I know. However, it is odd
>> that the introduction section does not have any description other than
>> terminology section. This will be very hard for a reader, specially new to
>> this topic, to get the context. I would at least expect some narratives and
>> some references for the readers. Please consider this.
>> 
> 
> My proposal is to move the first paragraph from the Security Considerations to the Introduction.
> 
> Old text: 
> 1. Introduction
> 
> 1.1. Terminology
> 
> New text:
> 1. Introduction
> 
> RFC 4210 Appendix D.2 [RFC4210] contains a set of algorithms,
> mandatory to be supported by conforming implementations. These
> algorithms were appropriate at the time CMP was released, but as
> cryptographic algorithms weaken over time, some of them should not be
> used anymore. In general, new attacks are emerging due to research
> cryptoanalysis or increase in computing power. New algorithms were
> introduced that are more resistant to today's attacks.
> 
> This document lists current cryptographic algorithms usable with CMP to
> offer an easier way maintaining the list of suitable algorithms over time. 
> 
> 1.1. Terminology
> 
> Best regards, 
> Hendrik