[Spasm] updated charter text and next steps...
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 10 June 2016 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BEF128B44 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.727
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.727 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kLoSYwZ59I29 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C35612D13E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95865BE2D for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:27:31 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNg2B9TFQEY5 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:27:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.210] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0168BE2C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:27:26 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1465586847; bh=ZdhGASLpkjBD/wni5KMqhpeHrC5DVQkdG7/Ze2D22Dk=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=jPvfOsJybHe17kh4RQv5f+8YaN5T6M7m1wCvcC0wHkYXRo7bgMTWfPndJ30VMtC0f iKrd3uO5lGnEvJ+bPm9i+B73a2UisJ3G101/TNggcgg/gqNAPDkQ86e8KEkBmyX5pt P/p1OhR/pgqiE2PmwPT7zycLvdPoIjJkqeV63IQw=
To: "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <575B149E.5020901@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:27:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080705010303060005090202"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GehYBVUFtpAY-bA4YkczyYo2tY0>
Subject: [Spasm] updated charter text and next steps...
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:27:38 -0000
Hiya, I've updated the draft charter [1] as I think the list wanted, please correct me if I goofed. Changes are: - deleted previous work items 2 and 4 - changed to draft-melnikov-spasm-eai-addresses for item 1 This is on the IESG telechat for next Thursday June 16th. After that all going well it goes out for a 2 week review by whoever cares and then would be back to the IESG for approval of the final charter and WG creation. So if that all happens with no delay this should be a WG on June 30th. If you have comments on the charter now, this list is probably best. If you have comments on it during the 2 week external review period, posting those to ietf@ietf.org (as well or instead as you think) is the right thing to do. I'll keep the list posted as to status in the meantime. Cheers, S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-spasm/
- [Spasm] updated charter text and next steps... Stephen Farrell