IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WGLC for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-sha3-hash

Daniel Van Geest <daniel.vangeest.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 31 January 2024 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel.vangeest.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AF6C14E515 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:51:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apHM-itqUmzG for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B230C14F60E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:51:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50e4e36c09cso1461661e87.1 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:51:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706723477; x=1707328277; darn=ietf.org; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Yg1dpjYTylUnfVQUntrnfemSRmxntYyVIwnJsM5CUjk=; b=AihkEjAs++greZD6X4K+0QOVq035Kl8fFqa1zq5CUQrfE1rDAMRUf25zRj4TKy1D1F omFSkS6MHEHy53cHdMQ0DbqDZRjJuso7yENLhA9llu4yrgGW44uXvJg4bTzrxySbts3/ Id3qlVdQNoCVZXtPEU4OuuChlZ9S/oVve2HWyTRrAd3JsAvC6PD4HQveVD6OFJnNuw09 oPM3qYM3eGSdhHoowTqVvAITlpRRepcrlMbZajKqRAVaiuq/U1RlTjpChdUA7YUYXVRs 2ZlLQoF+j4YHwul+YbBEQJkfcskCWHqaE2OSuad0KD+r7pNDRiHLz32Ry51X14WTric9 f/yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706723477; x=1707328277; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Yg1dpjYTylUnfVQUntrnfemSRmxntYyVIwnJsM5CUjk=; b=rWw2z6hB0/QCJ78xlNi9K6xAKhlDRdOYMPGdeQA7tDExAsEUaZ5Eh7e8ILTTqI5s3X zW4ENpXoJxsOj5SD+gLnx+BzaGWzZtXu3eBQ9sLvAyAWLSTEyQozBSR9O0ogLyDng3aY h2RlJMnts0R0GxxVbWRi6lGIFEZZS4RqIMt9PBT7rZ7YlCrnEPzkThZGzuvt0puqRPdD UWDIYypKzwMq2BZd+Nk+Ex0hall5A9rZ//L20F2zyoCwxNbeH9VNc7vE8jdtTQHF5acB yj/HQsipFLkKNkZd2/ht6tWWrpKEWfUI19MvcqjxJuu+6FvNr5ZI2q/WJyGSEYA9dvSL 7/Fw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwFHDkb+oY6jZS4ahLWDdg4DgZEgxP/3mnelhDkr3GVosYIbXGB XPhwd7C9S7cuWv6aJnDo92sGqnAtWrRr8jI5IcAYC7RsvBRVzMXjjDtPpBum
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHMdNsnbGk0qwtXY0JmX6gs/tMxePAfrkMvuHW11DvglbV47YaoLYw1tkXd0iLEAK8Cof/Gbw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4dbc:0:b0:511:1a7a:f81e with SMTP id h28-20020ac24dbc000000b005111a7af81emr118903lfe.1.1706723477229; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOPUE07G7D ([2001:8a0:6a10:d300:a971:50c7:43ec:4948]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a2-20020a5d4d42000000b0033afe816977sm3391683wru.66.2024.01.31.09.51.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:51:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Daniel Van Geest <daniel.vangeest.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: 'SPASM' <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <SN7PR14MB6492B10C0593B89D36FE221E837D2@SN7PR14MB6492.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <CH0PR11MB573905E2C705F61F1529E63C9F7D2@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <09a101da5450$b9e4afe0$2dae0fa0$@gmail.com> <F9E9ACCB-9159-4CB3-BC47-B091C480A216@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <F9E9ACCB-9159-4CB3-BC47-B091C480A216@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:51:16 -0000
Message-ID: <0a2601da546e$16fe47f0$44fad7d0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0A27_01DA546E.16FE47F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQG78XSjZkq1rD4S//IRAb8A1H/1VADUHj+vAa82dAECb3qeJrEJYX8Q
Content-Language: en-ca
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/I512O_8FhQpRBV5Fplqs63my50s>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WGLC for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-sha3-hash
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:51:29 -0000

 

 

From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 5:33 PM
To: Daniel Van Geest <daniel.vangeest.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WGLC for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-sha3-hash

 

We can get early assignment if people need them for code, but normal practice is for early assignment to be temporary.  The temporary assignment becomes permanent when the RFC is published.

 

I’m not sure what this is supposed to mean.  Don’t release any software using the temporary assignments until the RFC is published and they become permanent?  We’d like these for interop testing of cms-kemri and cms-kyber, surely this will be an RFC before both of those are, so at least I have no intention of releasing before this is an RFC.

 

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email