IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Re: [IANA #1457261] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-composite-kem (smi-numbers)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 05 August 2026 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0476B124529B9 for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1785959195; bh=XMejwO8+/t+fjIw8QCY8buAaYSRxM/tuzTeUN2guiMQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=a+4ghfgQhlUi/GSyvsCG5WEPUbVJbZhNabsqZt7nbG1RR2T6WJk//1fXYtjuZJ8If XAG2AroC8ZzmuACg5p39HO80iqbdbzXjW46UEwYjU8uEcO0344dRfz8zU5oyKonXFR 40tF4qBv7jdjBx2RbCkc7qzlbgzIB7sXlAlccsPo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oIVE2BqPlggh for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51DAD124529B4 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF9A1A0E0C; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 15:46:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [47.132.26.223]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A8461A117B; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 15:46:28 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.600.51.1.1\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-607102-1785956010-1742.1457261-9-0@icann.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 15:46:16 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B44A0C42-7E71-444C-9D1B-40DD357925F3@vigilsec.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1457261@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-495679-1785879278-1658.1457261-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-607102-1785956010-1742.1457261-9-0@icann.org>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.600.51.1.1)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=QeCOAy8QvQDWKhLwaX/gzwOJGAk1d7EnG2UpoCw4Xrw=; b=mgLZ5bV7fjnxMtp4hLCr6U769QAXQsdKTuCb/nJXLVZs8TAFwQ6fEYUTo9SX7RWmErNe/Zr3WPAVG5jHf9hOYgEhO92woUh9m6nYQxk7BhJ0uJCKlCqbdxnHlf+H4XIqmNNfx64fpHCdWWjo3m0cxdxQW/5obWueRg2/b9biW6EcUsCtcCOWbQuUIeyFL9jAtDOoMM/kOpWEKU5B+ufKY14pLLWYxSWsLt6DWn8NLQs9uA4OpoZfdHCdtjOb4mwqt8QOdJX5fwAfKTa4Zf2VA6QLuELXmS/Uyjbu+LWK38W/YJAa5eKhiUa/SfpgVCAF3KgaMZ01OroYuRD2spGWUw==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 66.39.134.11
Message-ID-Hash: HJBH4CLNVSJWEJB2XHBTDYRRXAK7R6JB
X-Message-ID-Hash: HJBH4CLNVSJWEJB2XHBTDYRRXAK7R6JB
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: [IANA #1457261] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-cms-composite-kem (smi-numbers)
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/JKJkbsdHogw0GDm2vIn_8_fjwW0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

David:

Yes, this looks fine.  91 seems to tbe the next available number.

Russ

> On Aug 5, 2026, at 2:53 PM, David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Russ (cc: lamps WG),
> 
> As the designated expert for the SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0) registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-lamps-cms-composite-kem-01 for us? Please see:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-composite-kem/
> 
> The due date is August 19th.
> 
> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers
> 
> When the review is complete (or, if you have concerns that need to be addressed, when the initial review is complete), we'll update the Datatracker's "IANA expert review" state and send any comments to the authors.
> 
> With thanks,
> 
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status