IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] [IANA #1276131] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail (pkix-parameters)

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Sat, 15 July 2023 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DEAC151997 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 14:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IT-PDswfLlpR for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 14:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com (mail-ot1-f46.google.com [209.85.210.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20035C14CE51 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 14:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6b71ee710edso2401638a34.2 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 14:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689457219; x=1692049219; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ufQ6FyM17s/Eg7M2gZSm/Btg/9dZd5FpKMOHyHuvxo4=; b=Jg81m7mpSBZ0AAtZ9LYVq0f1V69NxRuZJuJV3mSfrkVOan42lqV7D/LFu61bPJnkDQ kCHgVFWhe4biCNaUyn1L4MVD5jr8XK/3/XRWH8dIF8abmDLtgaDIQNhbW3MHwILIGg7g 2bIg1PAdzaR7wI0f2n1pjcl5ORdcahdpKNc8bnswINcg0dZMWi947N/p7816FdEs7SyH zNEfuS6otITvJTlOr56fRdhE6T39ZjWNqOY4ZBu+a9xm0iuoMPl4hUXvKFYojOnBgxYP nmJ4VBRH5pUqy4H7W4Vd//v0+rLSm2bdg1cFZ8+8Y7XiF3JFToJkLGvmYJxJ0gcT78sR IqSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLan11YrrJIJIgBXLoQ2fJHwoRy1UjgtJucPx30LDv8f+H72SA/D martB5zkgbqAVGgL+nakQAGEaKONdfToeffHWccleyeP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFCnXi7EcQncigf2UWcH4qxNzlZsDMYHrghTy5JQnSCCXVLQidIdJNbZlYkAQBFa/VNlK1jr6+pNN7c7cTRRMc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:f617:b0:1b0:8288:e698 with SMTP id ek23-20020a056870f61700b001b08288e698mr8921723oab.55.1689457219187; Sat, 15 Jul 2023 14:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1276131@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-106356-1688773092-1471.1276131-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-105365-1688773347-67.1276131-9-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-105365-1688773347-67.1276131-9-0@icann.org>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 17:40:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwj6-KO=JGuZjtpLOhxxUxQDnB4RCjXNkxMx0DdP5Rbzig@mail.gmail.com>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000069b84a06008d696d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/KJueozQPJcDCiMm88ZeD4FaJ6Ug>
Subject: Re: [lamps] [IANA #1276131] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail (pkix-parameters)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:40:24 -0000

The document looks OK, registration approved.

One nit that did come to mind is that the document says 'email' and does
not specify the email protocol. While it is currently reasonably obvious
this is going to be SMTP, that may not be the case in the future. If the
instant messaging people ever come up with a federated approach they are
likely to end up using alice@example.com type addresses. If they are
offering end-to-end secure messages of email length, well what would we
need SMTP for?


On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 7:42 PM David Dong via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:

> Dear Phillip (cc: lamps WG),
>
> As the designated expert for the Certification Authority Restriction
> Properties registry, can you review the proposed registration in
> draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail for us? Please see
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail/
>
> The due date is July 21st.
>
> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll
> make the registration at:
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/pkix-parameters/
>
> With thanks,
>
> David Dong
> IANA Services Specialist
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email