Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 04 March 2024 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F47C151980 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:39:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tGFpGTznAzn8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A5FC151095 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC9E1AC57F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:39:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1193C1AC7F3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 12:39:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 12:39:22 -0500
References: <170956700701.43395.17074106209162351942@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <170956700701.43395.17074106209162351942@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <F54E6517-3F15-4D7D-87E8-09969C8A561A@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; s=pair-202402141609; bh=wjn8xFp6z0o27AMhStV+W1CpohihybL8DNUzatWyf/Y=; b=Pg/5SmT6dGw13dGztWy9pFFYkdh20GyYGwuqj74ln/hIw9+CFdFHpZGtHCMOFD6OsamlRV3ub1+avCRJLrVd3N0HaxAEuKA8kA0fdFEaI4lcvI5QxgV2cT6eZpmt1//mg+rCc5/ngeJp33xCiNwSVDlstSKmHCjOrSWFjIi4qa9ZbXXArZxE5R5IbOMWAgLZEO+gTxZ+aM5PabiJOQ1skdq8v7UTVZc3WTXJlxlEgZ4/YNK1DgMHm+0afmS6nQ6jIeYITq7VLmr7JkA5CiwGo82NjQkkfFrLOnHO1kmu6JcgUrmAL8rXL5qWw2gt+vUTMRRHgYG3y/yWOoJMqrieiQ==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/LHjLG3oasQPqbI_o8WWu2JUVf2Q>
Subject: Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:39:37 -0000

The authors received an off-list comment asking to SMimeCapsSet to be added to the ASN.1 Module.  This does so.

The authors are unaware of any open issues.  We believe it is ready for WG Last Call.

Russ


> On Mar 4, 2024, at 10:43 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05.txt is now available. It is a
> work item of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME (LAMPS) WG
> of the IETF.
> 
>   Title:   Use of the RSA-KEM Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
>   Authors: Russ Housley
>            Sean Turner
>   Name:    draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05.txt
>   Pages:   33
>   Dates:   2024-03-04
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>   The RSA Key Encapsulation Mechanism (RSA-KEM) Algorithm is a one-pass
>   (store-and-forward) cryptographic mechanism for an originator to
>   securely send keying material to a recipient using the recipient's
>   RSA public key.  The RSA-KEM Algorithm is specified in Clause 11.5 of
>   ISO/IEC: 18033-2:2006.  This document specifies the conventions for
>   using the RSA-KEM Algorithm as a standalone KEM algorithm and the
>   conventions for using the RSA-KEM Algorithm with the Cryptographic
>   Message Syntax (CMS) using KEMRecipientInfo as specified in draft-
>   ietf-lamps-cms-kemri.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm