Re: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9399 (7535)

[Tim Hollebeek <[e-mail]>]

Verified, please mark as confirmed.

-Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spasm <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 1:33 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [lamps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9399 (7535)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9399, "Internet X.509
> Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 Certificates".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7535
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Preston Locke <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 6
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    Consequently, if relying party software accepts a CA, then it should
>    be prepared to (unquestioningly) display the associated logotypes to
>    its human user, given that it is configured to do so.  Information
>    about the logotypes is provided so that the replying party software
>    can select the one that will best meet the needs of the human user.
>    This choice depends on the abilities of the human user, as well as
>    the capabilities of the platform on which the replaying party
>    software is running.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    Consequently, if relying party software accepts a CA, then it should
>    be prepared to (unquestioningly) display the associated logotypes to
>    its human user, given that it is configured to do so.  Information
>    about the logotypes is provided so that the relying party software
>    can select the one that will best meet the needs of the human user.
>    This choice depends on the abilities of the human user, as well as
>    the capabilities of the platform on which the relying party
>    software is running.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The phrases "replying party" and "replaying party" are typos and should be
> "relying party"
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and
> edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9399 (draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509
> Certificates
> Publication Date    : May 2023
> Author(s)           : S. Santesson, R. Housley, T. Freeman, L. Rosenthol
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm