[lamps] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-06: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 03 August 2023 00:52 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail@ietf.org, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <169102395847.55726.15880774573405686871@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 17:52:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/NZeqdZal8r0qzdy5uQWj-4L0FRY>
Subject: [lamps] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-06: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I concur with Eric's observation that the shepherd writeup is missing the
"Why?" portion of the document status answer.

I suggest mentioning in the IANA Considerations section that the registry group
being referenced is "Public Key Infrastructure using X.509 (PKIX) Parameters".

[lamps] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker