Re: [lamps] sorry about today

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 31 July 2021 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B2A3A1866 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 17:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fi0nGzwa7jaw for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8047D3A1862 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 17:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F24D300C57 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:02:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ovjus0rvUhV5 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:02:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06E22300B1E; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:02:55 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <16287.1627689612@localhost>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:02:54 -0400
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3F149C2-F9A1-49C4-B7DA-E282BA9EFAE8@vigilsec.com>
References: <5cde3cb8-07e0-a4e3-bb55-0586e3b6b6a8@lear.ch> <16287.1627689612@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/PUF03ReuoHbAQyaiB0euwd4uB7M>
Subject: Re: [lamps] sorry about today
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 00:03:02 -0000

> On Jul 30, 2021, at 8:00 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote:
>> Sorry about not making the session to talk about CSR Attributes. Somehow I
>> missed LAMPs on my calendar and it conflicted with a group that I cochair.
> 
> I think it's important enough to have a topic-specific virtual interim.
> 
> Based upon another thread that I haven't finished reading, it would appear
> that this significantly and materially affects RFC8994/RFC8995.

Michael:

Does that mean that we need a joint virtual interim on this topic?

Russ